MHB Average Rate Of Change Formula

AI Thread Summary
The average rate of change formula is expressed as \(\frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x} = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}\). There is debate over the correct symbol to use, with some arguing that the notation \(\overline{\triangle}\) is also acceptable. The consensus suggests that while there is a standard symbol, any notation can be valid if properly defined. Ultimately, the emphasis is on clarity and consistency in notation rather than strict adherence to one symbol. Defining your notation is key to effective communication in mathematical contexts.
bwpbruce
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
Is this the correct symbol to use for average rate of change:
[math]\overline{\triangle}=\dfrac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a} [/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The correct notation for average rate of change is:
$$\frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x} = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$$
 
I would say that Greg's example is the "standard" or "usual" symbol for rate of change and that there is no "correct" symbol for anything! As long as you define your notation, there is no "incorrect" notation.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top