Background independent framework

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Topolfractal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Framework Independent
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the basics of non-commutative geometry (NCG), exploring its concepts, implications in physics, and resources for further learning. Participants share their understanding of NCG, its relevance to theories such as special and general relativity, and the challenges in grasping its complexities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe non-commutative geometry as involving path-dependent aspects, where the shortest path between two points may differ based on direction.
  • It is suggested that non-commutative geometry is significant in physics due to its implications for special and general relativity, particularly regarding observer-dependent and path-dependent time.
  • A participant mentions the Wikipedia article on non-commutative geometry as a starting point, though acknowledges it may not be an easy read.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of non-commutative geometry, questioning its connection to concepts like discreteness and quantum mechanics.
  • There is a request for references and further elaboration on the relationship between non-commutative geometry and classical theories of relativity.
  • One participant indicates that their description of non-commutative geometry is heuristic and not mathematically rigorous, aiming to convey the general idea rather than detailed technicalities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition and implications of non-commutative geometry, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of non-commutative geometry, particularly regarding its mathematical rigor and connections to other physical theories. There is also mention of the challenge in finding accessible resources that adequately explain the topic.

Topolfractal
Messages
76
Reaction score
7
What are the basics of non commutative geometry and where is a good place to learn more about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is geometry with non-commutative elements involved.
And you can learn about it in your local maths department.

Also, try google once in while. It will lead you to more information than you can handle in a year
 
JorisL said:
It is geometry with non-commutative elements involved.
And you can learn about it in your local maths department.

Also, try google once in while. It will lead you to more information than you can handle in a year
Okay do you have any recommendations for good sites on Google that explain it well. I know it involves non communative elements from the title, but why does it include non commutative elements?
 
A starting point is the wikipedia article on noncommutative geommetry. Not that easy a read though, maybe there's something better out there.
 
The basic concept of non-commutative geometry is that important aspects of it are path dependent. The shortest path from point A to point B may not necessarily be the shortest path from point B to point A.

While this seems odd and obscure, it isn't hard to imagine every day systems that display that property. For example, if you are in a city with a mix of one way streets, the fastest path from my house to yours may be different from the fastest path from your house to mine.

Non-commutative geometry matters in physics among other reasons, because due to special and general relativity, the time that elapses along a path from point A to point B is observer dependent (due to velocity) and path dependent (due to gravity which also impacts the passage of time), which makes many of the assumptions of non-relativistic Euclidian space-time invalid. Also note that since quantum mechanics includes special (but not general) relativity, non-commutative geometry matters for both the Standard Model and GR, the two most fundamental theories in physics.

Alas, I don't have any better references for you than have been mentioned above.
 
ohwilleke said:
The basic concept of non-commutative geometry is that important aspects of it are path dependent. The shortest path from point A to point B may not necessarily be the shortest path from point B to point A.

While this seems odd and obscure, it isn't hard to imagine every day systems that display that property. For example, if you are in a city with a mix of one way streets, the fastest path from my house to yours may be different from the fastest path from your house to mine.

Non-commutative geometry matters in physics among other reasons, because due to special and general relativity, the time that elapses along a path from point A to point B is observer dependent (due to velocity) and path dependent (due to gravity which also impacts the passage of time), which makes many of the assumptions of non-relativistic Euclidian space-time invalid. Also note that since quantum mechanics includes special (but not general) relativity, non-commutative geometry matters for both the Standard Model and GR, the two most fundamental theories in physics.

Alas, I don't have any better references for you than have been mentioned above.
THANK YOU! That was really helpful.
 
ohwilleke said:
The basic concept of non-commutative geometry is that important aspects of it are path dependent. The shortest path from point A to point B may not necessarily be the shortest path from point B to point A.

While this seems odd and obscure, it isn't hard to imagine every day systems that display that property. For example, if you are in a city with a mix of one way streets, the fastest path from my house to yours may be different from the fastest path from your house to mine..

This seems completely different from the meaning of "noncommutative geometry" I am (very vaguely) familiar with (as in Connes' NCG). Can you point to some reference ?
 
wabbit said:
This seems completely different from the meaning of "noncommutative geometry" I am (very vaguely) familiar with (as in Connes' NCG). Can you point to some reference ?

I will look for some references when I get a chance. My description parrots a couple of other descriptions that I've seen in print, but isn't the sort of thing I have well indexed. Obviously, the description I have provided is a heuristic one, rather than a technical mathematically rigorous one, that is focused on conveying the gist of what is really going on, rather than abstract algebra that one deals with mechanistically.
 
OK never mind the references, could you elaborate on what you said ?
The basic concept of non-commutative geometry is that important aspects of it are path dependent. The shortest path from point A to point B may not necessarily be the shortest path from point B to point A.
I don't really understand NCG and while I vaguely get the connection with discreteness and with QM I wasn't aware that NCG involved a non-commutative distance, nor with the connection with classical SR and GR you also mention. How does this work ?
 
  • #10
wabbit said:
OK never mind the references, could you elaborate on what you said ?

I don't really understand NCG and while I vaguely get the connection with discreteness and with QM I wasn't aware that NCG involved a non-commutative distance, nor with the connection with classical SR and GR you also mention. How does this work ?

I've made a couple of starts to answering you question (and there is one), but for some reason people expect me to work for $$$ too, so I haven't gotten a good response together, but want you to know that I'm not blowing you off either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K