Bad Movie Physics : How do I prove this wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amandacate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movie Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a scene from a movie where an actor performs an improbable dunk after throwing a ball against a backboard. Participants are exploring the physics behind the jump, particularly focusing on the energy and forces involved in such an action.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering how to calculate the energy required for the jump and comparing it to the maximum height a human can realistically achieve. There are inquiries about the appropriate formulas related to power, work, and kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various approaches to analyze the scenario. Some are suggesting specific calculations while others are questioning the methods and formulas that should be used.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on proving the impossibility of the dunk based on the actor's weight and height, indicating that assumptions about human capabilities are being critically examined.

amandacate
Messages
2
Reaction score
0


At 1:19 in that video, the actor throws the ball agaisnt the backboard. As the ball bounces backwards, the actor "flies up" from the free throw line and dunks the ball.

I know this is impossible, but I need the formulas that would prove this to be impossible.

I'm utterly lost and can't figure out what ones to use to show that dunking the ball at the actors weight and height is impossible. (Power, work, Newton's 3rd Law etc)

Any guidance would help extremely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
um calulate the engery needed to jump that high then find out the highest a human can possibliy jump?
 
Would you go about calculating energy using the formulas for power and work?
 
um u could do that or reg kinetic
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
35K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K