Bad Movie Physics : How do I prove this wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amandacate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movie Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the impossibility of an actor jumping high enough to dunk a basketball after throwing the ball against a backboard. Participants suggest using physics formulas related to energy, power, and work, as well as Newton's 3rd Law, to demonstrate the unrealistic nature of the jump. Calculating the energy required to reach the necessary height and comparing it to the maximum jump height of a human are key approaches mentioned. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise calculations to support the argument against the scene's plausibility. Overall, the thread seeks a clear mathematical framework to debunk the movie's portrayal of physics.
amandacate
Messages
2
Reaction score
0


At 1:19 in that video, the actor throws the ball agaisnt the backboard. As the ball bounces backwards, the actor "flies up" from the free throw line and dunks the ball.

I know this is impossible, but I need the formulas that would prove this to be impossible.

I'm utterly lost and can't figure out what ones to use to show that dunking the ball at the actors weight and height is impossible. (Power, work, Newton's 3rd Law etc)

Any guidance would help extremely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
um calulate the engery needed to jump that high then find out the highest a human can possibliy jump?
 
Would you go about calculating energy using the formulas for power and work?
 
um u could do that or reg kinetic
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top