Ball swinging from a rope - Net force and curved path

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbow615
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Rope
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 30 kg ball hanging from a 3-meter rope in a truck moving at 29.6 m/s. Participants clarify that the net force acting on the ball can be determined using the centripetal force equation, marad = m(v^2/r). There is confusion regarding the ball's angle and the nature of its motion, with suggestions that a free-body diagram would help visualize the forces at play. The truck's constant speed implies that the ball's angle is due to the truck's trajectory rather than any external forces. Ultimately, understanding the geometry and forces involved is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
jbow615
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Help Please -- Ball swinging from a rope

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 30 kg is hanging from a rope of 3 meter tied to the roof of a truck. The truck is moving at a constant speed of 29.6 m/s. As you look forward at the ball hanging from the roof of the truck, you see the ball hanging to the right at an angle 45 from the horizontial.

1-What is the net force acting on the ball?

2-What is the radius of the curved path of the ball if one viewed the ball from overhead?



Homework Equations



marad=m(v^2/r)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part 1, I think you would just solve for the net force using marad but I just wanted confrim.

For part two, I have no idea where to even begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jbow615 said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 30 kg is hanging from a rope of 3 meter tied to the roof of a truck. The truck is moving at a constant speed of 29.6 m/s. As you look forward at the ball hanging from the roof of the truck, you see the ball hanging to the right at an angle 45 from the horizontial.

1-What is the net force acting on the ball?

2-What is the radius of the curved path of the ball if one viewed the ball from overhead?
There appears to be information missing.
i.e. is the truck moving to the left or the right? Is the ball on a rope set up as a linear pendulum or circular pendulum or something else?

Since the truck is moving at a constant speed, there is no special reason for the rope to be hanging at any particular angle except 0deg (equilibrium due to gravity). In question 2, viewed from overhead, the path of the ball would not be curved at all.

The problem is mainly geometry - but you need to describe the situation.
Is there supposed to be a diagram?
 
Simon Bridge said:
There appears to be information missing.
i.e. is the truck moving to the left or the right? Is the ball on a rope set up as a linear pendulum or circular pendulum or something else?

Since the truck is moving at a constant speed, there is no special reason for the rope to be hanging at any particular angle except 0deg (equilibrium due to gravity). In question 2, viewed from overhead, the path of the ball would not be curved at all.

The problem is mainly geometry - but you need to describe the situation.
Is there supposed to be a diagram?
The truck is moving at constant speed, not constant velocity. If the rope hangs at a steady angle to one side, that tells us the trajectory of the truck.

Jbow615, I don't know what "marad" stands for, but yes, centripetal force is what you have to think about. What are the forces on the ball, and what is the relationship between their magnitudes?
 
Oh that's the information missing... ?! <facepalm>
So the truck goes "forward" and the ball hangs "to the right" of the direction of travel.

I figured marad means ##\small ma_{rad}## ... i.e. the mass times the centripetal acceleration.

"Where to begin" would be a free-body diagram of the ball ... what are the forces? What do they have to sum up to?
 
Ok I finally figured it out last night. Thank you guys for your help.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
1K