Ballentine's book: 1st or 2nd edition?

  • Context: Quantum 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maNoFchangE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the choice between the first and second editions of "Quantum Mechanics - Modern Development" by L. E. Ballentine for PhD research in atomic physics. The second edition includes an additional chapter on quantum information, but the first edition is noted for better print quality. Users report that the second edition suffers from poor print quality, with issues such as insufficient ink leading to difficult-to-read text. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the first edition suffices for research needs, especially if quantum information is not a priority.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with atomic physics research
  • Knowledge of textbook evaluation criteria
  • Experience with academic publishing standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between the first and second editions of "Quantum Mechanics - Modern Development"
  • Investigate the significance of quantum information in current atomic physics research
  • Explore reviews on print quality for academic textbooks
  • Learn about the latest developments in quantum mechanics literature
USEFUL FOR

PhD students in atomic physics, researchers evaluating quantum mechanics textbooks, and anyone interested in the quality of academic publications.

maNoFchangE
Messages
115
Reaction score
4
I'm planning to get a copy of Quantum Mechanics - Modern Development by L. E. Ballentine. However I am uncertain between the first and second editions. The first edition is cheaper. I will be using it for my PhD research with the topic of atomic physics. Will the second edition give me additional advantage in the subject I will be researching on which is not found in the first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Afaict, the 2nd edition just has an extra chapter about quantum information. I'd cough up the extra money -- you can never have too many textbooks. :oldwink:

(I bought one of the first copies of the 2nd edition, and the print quality was disappointingly poor. So I still use my 1st edition for everything except the quantum information material.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and maNoFchangE
Thank you for your reply.
Can you give examples by poor print quality, is it like it has many typos in text and equations?
From what I infer, you are saying that the first's print quality is better than the second?
 
Not typos -- more like not enough ink was used, so many letters were are a bit difficult to read. Possibly, I should have returned it to Amazon and complained, but it wasn't quite bad enough to make me do that. After all, I was able to read the quantum information chapter.

Note that this is some time ago. Newer printings might be ok.
 
strangerep said:
Not typos -- more like not enough ink was used, so many letters were are a bit difficult to read. Possibly, I should have returned it to Amazon and complained, but it wasn't quite bad enough to make me do that. After all, I was able to read the quantum information chapter.

Note that this is some time ago. Newer printings might be ok.
That's good to know.
Quantum information does not seem to be needed at least in the immediate future of my carrier, so I think I can forgo the second edition and purchase the first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
833
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K