Basic Derivation with negative exponents

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding negative exponents and their implications in calculus, particularly in relation to the binomial theorem. The original poster expresses confusion while attempting to learn from various sources, including a textbook and online references.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of the binomial theorem for negative and fractional exponents, questioning the assumptions behind its application. Some discuss the implications of using negative integers in binomial coefficients and the conditions under which certain expansions are valid.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the generalized binomial formula and its application to non-integer values. Participants are sharing insights and clarifications regarding the definitions and conditions necessary for using the theorem, though no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the conditions under which the binomial theorem applies, particularly regarding the size of terms and the assumptions about variables in the context of calculus.

fyamnky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello reader

So I'm trying to teach mysel calculus with Thompson's Calculus made easy.
I'm still in the very early stages and I got stuck with negative exponents.
I'd basically like an explanation fof what's going on here.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/26906498@N03/3705112800/

I've tried using online sources like:
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/exponent.htm
http://www.algebrahelp.com/lessons/simplifying/negativeexponents/

I also looked up Binomial Theorem on wikipedia which just confused me more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well basically, the binomial theorem is valid for only n being an integer such that

[tex](a+b)^n = b^n +^nC_1 b^{n-1}a + ^nC_2 b^{n-2}a^2 +...+ ^nC_r b^{n-r}a^r + a^n[/tex]


But if you use the definition of nCr being n!/(n-r)!r!. Then terms like nC1 works out as

[tex]^nC_1 = \frac{n!}{(n-1)!1!} = \frac{n(n-1)!}{(n-1)!}=n[/tex]

[tex]^nC_2 = \frac{n!}{(n-2)!1!} = \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)!}{(n-1)!2!}= \frac{n(n-1)}{2}[/tex]

So (a+b)n simplifies to this

[tex](a+b)^b = b^n + nb^{n-1}a + \frac{n(n-1)}{2!}b^{n-2}a^2 + \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{3!}b^{n-3}a^3 + ...[/tex]


so if ever you put n as a negative number or a fractional number then you'd have an infinite number of terms which is valid for |b/a| < 1.

so in the chapter, the expansion is valid for

[tex]\left | \frac{dx}{x} \right | < 1 \Rightarrow -1< \frac{dx}{x}<1[/tex]

or simply dx/x is small, that is why they neglected the terms after x-3


EDIT: Normally you won't need to do the y+dy = x +dx thing always, you can just usually apply y=xn => dy/dx=nxn-1
 
rockfreak667, if you go down far enough on the wikipedia page cited, you find "Newton's Generalized Binomial Formula" which does NOT require positive integers.

For any non-negative integers, n and m, [itex]n\ge m[/itex]
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ m\end{array}\right)= \frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}= \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)\cdot\cdot\codt\(n-m+1)}{m(m-1)(m-2)\cdot\cdot\cdot(3)(2)(1)}[/tex]
In that final form, we can, in fact, write it out for n and m any numbers, not just non-negative integers. Of course,
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{c} n \\ n\end{array}\right)= 1[/itex]<br /> and <br /> [tex]\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ n-1\end{array}\right)= n[/itex]<br /> for any n, non-negative integer or not. Thus, we can write<br /> (x+ h)<sup>n</sup>= (1)x<sup>n</sup>+ (n)x<sup>{n-1}</sup>h+ terms involving h<sup>2</sup> or higher, for any number n, positive integer or not. Then, (x+h)<sup>n</sup>- x<sup>n</sup>= n x<sup>n-1</sup>h+ terms involving h<sup>2</sup> or higher and, dividing by h, [(x+h)<sup>n</sup>- x<sup>n</sup>]/h= n x<sup>n-1</sup>+ terms involving h or powers of h. Taking the limit as h goes to 0, all those "terms involving h or powers of h" go to 0 leaving only nx<sup>n-1</sup>.[/tex][/tex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
rockfreak667, if you go down far enough on the wikipedia page cited, you find "Newton's Generalized Binomial Formula" which does NOT require positive integers.

That's how I learned the binomial theorem, first with n being a positive integer and then the generalized form for fractions and negative numbers. Most likely due to working out 50C34 and such we just used a calculator instead of writing it out...things like -3C1 on a calculator would make me go :bugeye:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
70K
Replies
15
Views
42K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K