Basic Kinematics - shouldn't there be a constant?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


probstat.png


Homework Equations


a=dv/dt, v=dx/dt, x=integ(vdt)

The Attempt at a Solution


probsol.png

We were given the above problem and solution. Everything seems very straightforward. My question is this: should the function for acceleration also include a constant, e.g.
alpha.PNG
[/B]
?
None of the given initial conditions seem to indicate that a(0)=0.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • probstat.png
    probstat.png
    21.4 KB · Views: 540
  • probsol.png
    probsol.png
    22 KB · Views: 561
  • alpha.PNG
    alpha.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 368
Physics news on Phys.org
Taulant Sholla said:
None of the given initial conditions seem to indicate that a(0)=0.
On the contrary: it is easy to see that ##a(0) = {d\over dt} (\alpha - \beta t^2) \Bigr |_{t=0} = 0##

It is not wise to use the same symbol ##\alpha## for two different things :rolleyes:

A constant only appears if you are given e.g. a velocity and need to calculate the position.
If you have the position as a function of time, the velocity is unambiguous: no constant.

Mutatis mutandis for acceleration and velocity.
 
Last edited:
When you find the acceleration you take the derivative of the velocity function. Only when you integrate a function do you have to add a constant.
 
Ach - yes, thank you. Pretty embarrassing :oops: