Basic proof about inverse images of sets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof concerning inverse images of sets in the context of a function mapping from set X onto set Y. The original poster seeks to establish a relationship between an element in subset B of Y and its corresponding inverse image in subset A of X.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion about the proof and requests hints. Some participants clarify the definitions of inverse images and question the assumptions made regarding the function's properties. Others emphasize the importance of distinguishing between "is a subset of" and "is in."

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and implications of the problem. Clarifications regarding the correct use of terminology have been provided, and there is a recognition of the original poster's misunderstanding. The discussion appears to be moving towards a clearer understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions their background in physics and mathematics, indicating a potential overlap with calculus and linear algebra topics. There is also a note about the textbook's terminology, which may have contributed to the confusion in the proof attempt.

jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] basic proof about inverse images of sets

Homework Statement



let f map X onto Y, and let A be a subset of X, B subset of Y

1) Prove that if y is in B, then f^(-1) (y) is in f^(-1) (B)

The Attempt at a Solution



1) I think I'm missing some two-line proof, because I'm getting nowhere and this is supposed to be simple. I just don't know where to start, so just a hint would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement, as given, is not true. Since f is only given as a "map", it may not have an inverse function and so f-1(y) may not exist. Your question, however, is about "inverse images", which exist whether or not f has an inverse. What is true is that f-1({y}) is a subset of f-1(B). {y} is, of course, the set containing the single point y. That statement follows directly from the definition of "inverse image". What is the definition of f-1(B)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
f^-1 (B) := {x in X| f(x) in B}

The book told us that strictly speaking one should write f({y}), but in order to keep simplicity, they just use the notation f(y). What I'm trying to prove is what you have written down. I am sorry I didn't bring that part over correct.but, back to the problem. this would make

f^-1 (y) = {x in X| f(x) in {y}}
f^-1 (B) = {x in X| f(x) in B}

because y is in B, this implies that f^-1 (y) is in f^-1 (B), is that right?

Anyway, thanks for your help... I'm not even sure if this is 'calc&beyond'... I'm studying physics and took mathematics as a major too since the start of this year, and this class is given at the same time as the first calculus and linear algebra classes.
 
jacobrhcp said:
f^-1 (B) := {x in X| f(x) in B}

The book told us that strictly speaking one should write f({y}), but in order to keep simplicity, they just use the notation f(y). What I'm trying to prove is what you have written down. I am sorry I didn't bring that part over correct.
Hmmph! Well, go by your textbook- but the part about "is a subset of" rather than "is in" is important.


but, back to the problem. this would make

f^-1 (y) = {x in X| f(x) in {y}}
f^-1 (B) = {x in X| f(x) in B}

because y is in B, this implies that f^-1 (y) is in f^-1 (B), is that right?
Again, "is a subset of" not "is in" which means "is a member of". f^{-1}(y)= f^{-1}(\{y\}) is a subset of X, not a member of X! If x\in f^{-1}(\{y\}), then, by definition, f(x)\in \{y\} which is a subset of B. Therefore, if x\in f^{-1}({y}), f(x)\in B.
 
haha, I love the fact you could respond so quickly.

The textbook used 'is a subset of' instead of 'is in' on many places (I think in all the places it is necessary), I just went over it too fast so I didn't copy it right because I hasn't realized it made such a difference. I get what you're explaining now, though.

Thanks, and SOLVED!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K