Basic question about separable diffeq methodology

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfred_Tarski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffeq Separable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the methodology of solving separable differential equations, specifically the use of the indefinite integral sign in the process. The author explains that while the indefinite integral is defined as ∫f(x)dx = F(x) + C, its application must be meaningful and well-formed, particularly in the context of differential notation. The example provided, dy/dx = xy, illustrates the proper manipulation of differentials and integrals, emphasizing that the integral sign should only be applied to expressions containing differentials. The author concludes that the notation, while historically accepted, can lead to confusion without a rigorous understanding of calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals.
  • Familiarity with the notation of differential equations.
  • Knowledge of the properties of logarithmic and exponential functions.
  • Experience with solving separable differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definitions and properties of indefinite integrals in calculus.
  • Explore the concept of separable differential equations in greater depth.
  • Learn about the relationship between differential notation and integral calculus.
  • Investigate the historical development of calculus notation and its implications for modern mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of differential equations and calculus methodology.

alfred_Tarski
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
It's my understanding that the definition of the indefinite integral is:

∫f(x)dx = F(x) + C, where d/dx [F(x) + C] = f(x) and C is an arbitrary constant

And while dx has meaning apart from the indefinite integral sign the indefinite integral sign has no meaning apart from dx. Adding an indefinite integral sign to both sides of an equation would be similar to adding an open bracket to both sides of an equation; which of course is meaningless.

So my question is when using the common method to solve separable differential equation why do we infact do this, e.g.

dy/dx = xy
dy/y = x dx
∫dy/y = ∫x dx
ln [y] = x^2/2 + C
y = exp[x^2/2 + C]

My naive idea was that since all elementary antiderivatives can be written using other symbology besides the indefinite integral sign that adding an indefinite integral sign could be always be expressed as something else; I know this might seem silly but the method is nonsensical to begin with. However I think this is actually impossible to do because of very strange problems with the arbitrary constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One should understand that the differential and integral notation became accepted and widespread much earlier than calculus got proper rigor. So the notation may sometimes be inexact and confusing.

However, in the example given, observe that the "integral sign" is always applied to terms that already contain either dx or dy; so the expressions are always well formed. Informally, one could think that the "integral sign" cancels the "differential sign", and so it may be applied only to differentials, i.e., expressions of the kind f(x)dx.

Formally, only derivatives and definite integrals are used, d(something) is used only as part of the symbol for these two operations, never by itself.

[itex]\frac {dy}{dx} = X(x)Y(y)[/itex]

really means this:

[itex]\frac {d}{dx}y(x) = X(x)Y(y(x))[/itex]

[itex]\frac {\frac {d}{dx}y(x)}{Y(y(x))} = X(x)[/itex]

So we have functions of x on both sides of the equation, thus we can integrate them in some interval [t_{0}, t]:

[itex]\int_{t_{0}}^t\frac {\frac {d}{dx}y(x)}{Y(y(x))}dx = \int_{t_{0}}^tX(x)dx[/itex]

Now substitute

[itex]u = y(x)[/itex]

Then

[itex]\int_{t_{0}}^t\frac {\frac {d}{dx}y(x)}{Y(y(x))}dx = \int_{y(t_{0})}^{y(t)}\frac {du}{Y(u)}[/itex]

Hence

[itex]\int_{y(t_{0})}^{y(t)}\frac {du}{Y(u)} = \int_{t_{0}}^tX(x)dx[/itex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K