Basic Selection Rule for Angular Momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding quantum mechanical selection rules, particularly regarding angular momentum during photon emission. It is clarified that when an electron transitions from spin up to spin down, it does not simply reorient its angular momentum but rather changes the total angular momentum of the system. The key point is that while the orbital angular momentum quantum number "l" remains unchanged, the change in the electron's spin orientation affects the total angular momentum "J," which is the vector sum of orbital and spin angular momentum. This change in "J" accounts for the one unit of angular momentum carried away by the emitted photon. Ultimately, the transition from 2P_3/2 to 2P_1/2 is considered an allowed transition due to this angular momentum exchange.
teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I am getting confused by the QM selection rules. Photons have an angular momentum of 1. So when a transition of some sort occurs and a photon is emitted, the atom must lose 1 unit of angular momentum.

My question is, is a electron transitioning from spin up to spin down (m_s from +1/2 ---> -1/2) an appropriate way to "get rid" of the 1 unit of angular momentum? It does not make sense to me that it would because that would just be a re-orientation of the z component rather than a change in the vector itself.

This is the table I am trying to understand (for the magnetic and electric dipoles).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_rule#Summary_table

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teroenza said:
My question is, is a electron transitioning from spin up to spin down (m_s from +1/2 ---> -1/2) an appropriate way to "get rid" of the 1 unit of angular momentum? It does not make sense to me that it would because that would just be a re-orientation of the z component rather than a change in the vector itself.

But you can't just "re-orient" the electron, in the end state you have two particles. Suppose initially the electron has spin 1/2. Then the end state has spin 1 - 1/2 = 1/2, where 1 comes from the photon. Now, if you flip the z-axis, the initial state has spin -1/2, and end state has spin -1 + 1/2 = -1/2.
 
By reorientation I mean a change from spin up (m_s =+1/2) to spin down (m_S=-1/2). I think my question ultimately is : If the orbital angular momentum quantum number "l" does not change during the transition, is the change in spin orientation (because that's what I thought m_s was, just the z component) enough to account for the lost unit of momentum from the electron. The \Delta S=0 makes sense because you can't change the magnitude of the electron's spin, just it's z component (orientation).
 
Now, looking at my modern physics textbook I think I see why I was wrong. The magnitude of L and S stay the same, but the change in m_s changes the magnitude of J because J=L+S, added as vectors. That change in J, accounts for the photon's 1 unit of momentum.
 
I think a test question I should ask is: Is a transition from 2P_3/2---> 2P_1/2 an allowed transition? The one unit of angular momentum for the photon coming from the electron's spin change.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K