Basic special relativity question

In summary, the conversation discusses the scenario of three rockets moving at the same speed and emitting light pulses in their rest frame. The question is whether the pulses reach the middle rocket simultaneously and if not, which one arrives first. It is determined that the pulses do reach the middle rocket simultaneously in all frames of reference, but according to the observer, the pulse from the back rocket must have been emitted first to arrive at the same time. This is due to the middle rocket being closer to the spot where the front rocket emitted its pulse and further from the spot where the back rocket emitted its pulse. The fact that the front and back rockets are equidistant from the observer at the moment the middle rocket passes does not mean the pulses were emitted simultaneously
  • #1
theneedtoknow
176
0

Homework Statement


Three rockets are lined up in a straight line an equal distance from each other and are moving at the same speed (in other words they are at rest wrt each other). The line of 3 rockets passes an observer, and, at the exact moment that the middle rocket passes the observer, the front and back rockets emit light pulses simultaneously (in the rockets' rest frame).
Do the pulses reach the middle rocket simultaneously? If not, which one arrives first?
According to the observer they passed, were the light pulses emitted simultaneously? If not,
which pulse was emitted first. Explain.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


for the first part, i think they reach the rocket simultaneously since in their rest frame they are an equal distance from each other and at rest so both pulses will reach the middle rocket after a time of d/c where distance is the constant distance in betweenrockets.

Now he second part has me a bit confused
if the pulses reach the midde rocket simultaneously in one frame of reference, it means they reach it simultaneously in all frame, so the observer will see them reach the middle rocket simultaneously. Now, since th rockets are all moving in the same direction, it means that by the time the pulses reach the middle rocket, it would have moved closer to the spot where the front rocket emitted its pulse and away from the spot that the back rocket emitted its pulse, so to retain simultaniety, the observer would think that the back rocket emitted its pulse first, and the front rocket emited it second.
BUT I would also think that , since as the middle rocket passes the observer, the front and back rockets are equidistant to the observer at that point, wouldn't the pulses still be simultaneous and reach the observer at the same time BUT reach the middle rocket at different times? Obviously one of these 2 ways of thinking is wrong, so can someone point out what's the problem with one of them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
theneedtoknow said:
Now he second part has me a bit confused
if the pulses reach the midde rocket simultaneously in one frame of reference, it means they reach it simultaneously in all frame, so the observer will see them reach the middle rocket simultaneously.
Good thinking. Everyone agrees that the pulses reach the middle rocket simultaneously.
Now, since th rockets are all moving in the same direction, it means that by the time the pulses reach the middle rocket, it would have moved closer to the spot where the front rocket emitted its pulse and away from the spot that the back rocket emitted its pulse, so to retain simultaniety, the observer would think that the back rocket emitted its pulse first, and the front rocket emited it second.
That's right. According to the observer, the pulse from the back rocket has a greater distance to travel and thus must have been emitted first in order to arrive at the same time as the other pulse.
BUT I would also think that , since as the middle rocket passes the observer, the front and back rockets are equidistant to the observer at that point, wouldn't the pulses still be simultaneous and reach the observer at the same time BUT reach the middle rocket at different times?
While it's true that the front and back rockets are equidistant from the observer at that moment, that doesn't mean the pulses are emitted simultaneously according to the observer. And if the pulses arrive at the middle rocket at the same time, everyone must agree on that fact.
 
  • #3
Oh I understand now :) Thank you very much! :)
 

1. What is special relativity?

Special relativity is a theory developed by Albert Einstein in 1905 that explains the relationship between space and time. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion and that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion.

2. How does special relativity differ from Newtonian mechanics?

Special relativity differs from Newtonian mechanics in that it takes into account the effects of high speeds and large distances. In Newtonian mechanics, time and space are considered absolute, while in special relativity, they are relative and depend on the observer's frame of reference. Additionally, special relativity introduces the concept of spacetime, where space and time are combined into a four-dimensional continuum.

3. What is the significance of the speed of light in special relativity?

The speed of light, denoted by the letter c, plays a crucial role in special relativity. It is considered to be the maximum speed at which any object or information can travel in the universe. According to special relativity, the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This has far-reaching implications for our understanding of space and time.

4. What is time dilation in special relativity?

Time dilation is a phenomenon predicted by special relativity that states that time passes differently for observers in different frames of reference. This means that an observer moving at high speeds will experience time passing slower than an observer at rest. This effect is only noticeable at speeds approaching the speed of light and has been confirmed through various experiments and observations.

5. Can special relativity be applied to everyday situations?

Yes, special relativity has practical applications in many areas of modern life, including GPS systems, particle accelerators, and nuclear energy. However, the effects of special relativity are only noticeable at high speeds and small scales, so they may not be noticeable in everyday situations. Nevertheless, the principles of special relativity have greatly contributed to our understanding of the universe and have led to many technological advancements.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
525
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
232
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
896
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
779
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
616
Back
Top