Basis for Matrix: Is [0 0]^t Always the Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroknife
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a basis for the null space of a matrix, particularly in the context of linear transformations. Participants are examining the implications of having a matrix in reduced row echelon form (RREF) and its relationship to the null space.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of a basis and question whether the basis can include the zero vector. There is discussion about the null space of a matrix and its characteristics, particularly when the RREF has a pivot in every column.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and relationships between the null space and its basis. Some participants are questioning the assumptions about the nature of the null space and its representation, while others are attempting to clarify the distinction between a vector space and its basis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement specifically asks for a basis of the null space, leading to confusion about the nature of the null space when the RREF indicates a unique solution. There is also mention of the implications of having a pivot in every column of the RREF.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
When you have a matrix like:
3 1
0 1

The RREF is
1 0
0 1
the identity matrix.

Is the basis always [0 0]^t?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pyroknife said:
When you have a matrix like:
3 1
0 1

The RREF is
1 0
0 1
the identity matrix.

Is the basis always [0 0]^t?

No, a basis is never [0 0]^t. A basis always consists of nonzero vectors, and for a 2-D space you need two of them. Anyway, what is a "basis of a matrix"? I have never heard of that term.

RGV
 
I was looking at the answers in the back of the book for the attached problem.
The problem statement is "find a basis for the null space of the linear transformation T.

Their answer was {[0 0]^t}. I don't understand how they got this.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 483
pyroknife said:
I was looking at the answers in the back of the book for the attached problem.
The problem statement is "find a basis for the null space of the linear transformation T.

Their answer was {[0 0]^t}. I don't understand how they got this.

OK, that seems to be a different question from what you first asked. The question is: what is the null space of the matrix? For the given matrix, the null space consists of a single point (x,y) = (0,0); do you know why?

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
OK, that seems to be a different question from what you first asked. The question is: what is the null space of the matrix? For the given matrix, the null space consists of a single point (x,y) = (0,0); do you know why?

RGV

Isn't it asking for the basis of the nullspace or is the nullspace of the matrix the same thing?

Hmm, I'm not sure why, it seems if the RREF form has a pivot in every column then this is the case.
Is it cause the augmented matrix would look something like
1 0 0
0 1 0
thus x=0, y=0?
 
Can someone answer this?
 
pyroknife said:
Isn't it asking for the basis of the nullspace or is the nullspace of the matrix the same thing?
The problem is asking for a basis of the nullspace of the transformation. A vector space is different from a basis for that vector space. You can get all of the vectors in some vector space by taking linear combinations of the vectors in a basis.

Here's an example. Suppose that the nullspace happened to be all of the vectors in R2 that lie along the x-axis. A basis for this space is the vector <1, 0>T. This nullspace has infinitely many vectors in it, but all of them are a linear combination (multiples of in the case) the vector <1, 0>T.
pyroknife said:
Hmm, I'm not sure why, it seems if the RREF form has a pivot in every column then this is the case.
Is it cause the augmented matrix would look something like
1 0 0
0 1 0
thus x=0, y=0?
Yes.
 
pyroknife said:
Isn't it asking for the basis of the nullspace or is the nullspace of the matrix the same thing?

Hmm, I'm not sure why, it seems if the RREF form has a pivot in every column then this is the case.
Is it cause the augmented matrix would look something like
1 0 0
0 1 0
thus x=0, y=0?
The question did not ask for a basis of the nullspace, it asked for the nullspace itself. The entire null space consists of the 0 vector. That does not have a basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K