Basis for set of solutions for linear equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a basis for the set of solutions to the linear equation $x+y-2z=0$. Participants explore the problem in three parts: identifying solutions in vector form, determining vectors that span the solution set, and proving the linear independence of those vectors to establish a basis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confidence in finding the solutions in vector form, identifying free variables and presenting the solution as $(-t+2s,t,s)$.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the first two parts and notes that the vectors $(-1,1,0)$ and $(2,0,1)$ are independent and lie in the plane defined by the equation.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of the vectors as defining new planes, which may not align with the original equation.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of a basis as a linearly independent spanning set, with one participant questioning if the identified vectors form a basis.
  • A later reply affirms that the vectors do indeed form a basis for the set of solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the identification of the vectors $(-1,1,0)$ and $(2,0,1)$ as spanning the solution set and being linearly independent. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the implications of defining new planes based on these vectors.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the relationship between the original equation and the derived vectors, noting that the interpretation of these vectors as defining new planes may complicate the understanding of their linear independence and spanning properties.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals studying linear algebra, particularly those interested in the concepts of vector spaces, bases, and linear independence in the context of linear equations.

TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
[solved] Basis for set of solutions for linear equation

Hi,

I have this problem I was working through, but I'm not sure that I've approached it from the right way. The problem consists of 3 parts, which build off of each other. I'm pretty confident about the first two parts, but no so much for the third. Here's the problem

Consider the linear equation $x+y-2z=0$
A). Find all solutions of this equation in vector form:
B). Give two vectors that span the set of solutions:
C). Prove that those two vectors are linearly independent and hence give a basis for the set of solutions

The first part, I basically pointed out that y and z are free variables, and expressed them as such
$y=t$
$z=s$
$x=-t+2s$
Solutions given by $(-t+2s,t,s)$

Then the second part, I just split up that vector into two separate vectors:
$t(-1,1,0)+s(2,0,1)$

For the third part, I used a basic proof that two vectors in ${R}^{n}$ are linearly depended iff one vector is a scalar multiple of the other. Therefore they are linearly independent.

Here's where I'm really not sure about much at all. I basically used the initial system, and turned the two vectors in part 2 into linear equations.
$x+y-2z=0$
$-x+y=0$
$2x+z=0$
I then used these three systems to make a 3x3 matrix which I row reduced. It came out as a matrix with a unique solution, so I thought the basis would be $(1,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,0,1)$, or maybe the initial equations expressed as vectors $(1,1,-2),(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)$.

Though, I'm really not sure here, as these span ${R}^{3}$ and seem a little too broad for what we are after. Any help would be great. Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hi,

I have this problem I was working through, but I'm not sure that I've approached it from the right way. The problem consists of 3 parts, which build off of each other. I'm pretty confident about the first two parts, but no so much for the third. Here's the problem

Consider the linear equation $x+y-2z=0$
A). Find all solutions of this equation in vector form:
B). Give two vectors that span the set of solutions:
C). Prove that those two vectors are linearly independent and hence give a basis for the set of solutions

The first part, I basically pointed out that y and z are free variables, and expressed them as such
$y=t$
$z=s$
$x=-t+2s$
Solutions given by $(-t+2s,t,s)$

Then the second part, I just split up that vector into two separate vectors:
$t(-1,1,0)+s(2,0,1)$

For the third part, I used a basic proof that two vectors in ${R}^{n}$ are linearly depended iff one vector is a scalar multiple of the other. Therefore they are linearly independent.

Hi fallen angel,

It's all correct so far.

TheFallen018 said:
Here's where I'm really not sure about much at all. I basically used the initial system, and turned the two vectors in part 2 into linear equations.
$x+y-2z=0$
$-x+y=0$
$2x+z=0$
I then used these three systems to make a 3x3 matrix which I row reduced. It came out as a matrix with a unique solution, so I thought the basis would be $(1,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,0,1)$, or maybe the initial equations expressed as vectors $(1,1,-2),(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)$.

Though, I'm really not sure here, as these span ${R}^{3}$ and seem a little too broad for what we are after. Any help would be great. Thanks :)

The equation $x+y-2z=0$ represents a plane. Its normal vector is $(1,1,-2)$.
And you've found that $(-1,1,0)$ and $(2,0,1)$ are 2 independent vectors in that plane.
Note that they are both perpendicular to $(1,1,-2)$.

However, when we turn $(-1,1,0)$ into the equation $-x+y=0$, we're defining a new plane that is perpendicular to $(-1,1,0)$.
In other words $(-1,1,0)$ is not in that new plane.

Similarly the 3rd equation is yet another plane.
These 3 planes intersect each other uniquely in the origin.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi fallen angel,

It's all correct so far.
The equation $x+y-2z=0$ represents a plane. Its normal vector is $(1,1,-2)$.
And you've found that $(-1,1,0)$ and $(2,0,1)$ are 2 independent vectors in that plane.
Note that they are both perpendicular to $(1,1,-2)$.

However, when we turn $(-1,1,0)$ into the equation $-x+y=0$, we're defining a new plane that is perpendicular to $(-1,1,0)$.
In other words $(-1,1,0)$ is not in that new plane.

Similarly the 3rd equation is yet another plane.
These 3 planes intersect each other uniquely in the origin.

Hmm, ok, so I wasn't on the right path there. It seems after doing some research, that a basis is basically a linearly independent spanning set. Since in question 2 I showed that these vectors, ${(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)}$ span the set of solutions, and since I showed in the first part of question 3 that they are linearly independent, is it right to say that ${(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)}$ form a basis for the set of solutions? Thanks
 
TheFallen018 said:
Hmm, ok, so I wasn't on the right path there. It seems after doing some research, that a basis is basically a linearly independent spanning set. Since in question 2 I showed that these vectors, ${(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)}$ span the set of solutions, and since I showed in the first part of question 3 that they are linearly independent, is it right to say that ${(-1,1,0),(2,0,1)}$ form a basis for the set of solutions? Thanks

Yep. (Nod)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Nod)

You're a legend. Thanks! :)
 
TheFallen018 said:
You're a legend. Thanks! :)
Oh don't tell him that! Now he's going to get the idea that he's good at what he does and that he's a better Mathematician than I am. And that's just crazy talk. (I've got the medication to know what that is.) (Nod)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Oh don't tell him that! Now he's going to get the idea that he's good at what he does and that he's a better Mathematician than I am. And that's just crazy talk. (I've got the medication to know what that is.) (Nod)

-Dan

It's too late.
I AM LEGENDARY! (Poolparty)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K