Basis, Nullspace, Linear transformtion

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the null space of a linear transformation T and the correct method to do so. The user initially attempted to solve T(v) = 0 using an augmented matrix but faced confusion regarding the validity of their approach. It was clarified that while both methods yield the same result, the teacher emphasized the importance of ensuring that the resulting vector belongs to the specified vector space V. The conversation highlights the complexity of identifying the null space and the necessity of verifying that the solutions align with the requirements of the problem. Ultimately, the user acknowledges the intricacies involved in the process.
pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
The problem is attached, I did parts 1-3, but I am having trouble with part 4. This is what i was planning on doing for part 4 (my teacher said this wasn't the correct method):

set T(v)=0
and solve the augmented matrix
1 0 -1 1 0
2 1 -2 4 0
3 1 -1 7 0

rref gives
1 0 0 2 0
0 1 0 2 0
0 0 1 1 0

So N(T)=span{[-2 -2 -1 1]^t}
So shouldn't a basis for N(T) be [-2 -2 -1 1]^t?I don't understand how this is wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 482
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see anything wrong with it either. What you're doing is to solve the equation
$$T\begin{bmatrix}a\\ b\\ c\\ d\end{bmatrix}=0.$$ Maybe your teacher just thought that this was a bad idea compared to solving
$$T\begin{bmatrix}2b-2c\\ b\\ c\\ -c\end{bmatrix}=0,$$ where two of the unknowns have already been eliminated because we're using what we know about the null space of A. But I get the same result with both methods, so I can't say that the second one is significantly better.
 
I talked to him again and he said "the way I did it, I was finding all of the vectors in R4 such that T(x)=0. The question is asking to find all vectors in V such that T(x)=0 which is a different question."

The basis found in part 1 is {[2 1 0 0] [2 0 -1 1]}.
The linear transformation of these two vectors is
[2 5 7]^t and [4 10 14]^t respectively.

Te matrix for this is
2 4
5 10
7 14

Rref is
1 2
0 0
0 0

The coordinate vector that spans the null space is [2 -1]^t

So the basis is 2[2 1 0 0] + 1[2 0 -1 1]= [-2 -2 -1 1]

Wow that got really tricky a d conplicated
 
pyroknife said:
I talked to him again and he said "the way I did it, I was finding all of the vectors in R4 such that T(x)=0. The question is asking to find all vectors in V such that T(x)=0 which is a different question."
Right, that's what I meant. The thing is, both methods give us the same result, so what you did can't be completely wrong. I think the only problem is this: When you do it your way, you don't automatically know that the vector you find is actually a member of V (= the null space of A), so you also have to verify that it is.
 
pyroknife said:
The basis found in part 1 is {[2 1 0 0] [2 0 -1 1]}.
The linear transformation of these two vectors is
[2 5 7]^t and [4 10 14]^t respectively.

Te matrix for this is
2 4
5 10
7 14

Rref is
1 2
0 0
0 0

The coordinate vector that spans the null space is [2 -1]^t

So the basis is 2[2 1 0 0] + 1[2 0 -1 1]= [-2 -2 -1 1]

Wow that got really tricky a d conplicated
I don't understand exactly what you're doing here. I think it may be an advantage for me that I don't remember the fancy ways of doing these things. :smile: All I did was this: You know from part 1 that any member of V can be written as a linear combination of the two basis vectors you found: a[2 1 0 0]T+b[2 0 -1 1]T =[2a+2b a -b b]T So now you just need to solve T[2a+2b a -b b]T=0. This gives you a relationship between a and b. Use that relationship and set b=1, or whatever is convenient.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K