Bead on a hoop+accelerating elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhMichael
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead Elevator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bead on a hoop within an accelerating elevator. Participants are tasked with determining the minimum velocity required for the bead to reach a specific point on the hoop, considering forces acting on the bead in a non-inertial frame.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to solve the problem, including energy conservation and Newton's second law in an accelerating frame. Questions arise regarding the validity of equations derived and the role of normal force in the system.

Discussion Status

The conversation reflects a mix of attempts to reconcile different approaches, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their equations. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of normal force and its necessity for the bead's motion, with no clear consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the hoop is frictionless and discuss the implications of this condition on the forces acting on the bead. There is also mention of the need for the normal force to be non-zero at the target point, adding complexity to the analysis.

PhMichael
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/8904/bead.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The picture speaks for itself. I'm asked to find the minimum velocty that this bead should be given so that it will reach point B. 2. The attempt at a solution

I've solved this question using energy conservation with a "new gravity": [tex]g_{eff}=g+a[/tex] , so that:

[tex]0.5mV^{2}=m(g+a)(2R) \to V=2 \sqrt{(g+a)R}[/tex]

and this is the right answer.

However, supposing I want to solve this question using Newton's 2nd law in an accelerating frame, so:

[tex]m \vec {a}_{rel} = \vec{F}_{real} - m \vec{a}_{frame}[/tex]

If i take the positive values to be in the direction of the relative acceleration, i'll obtain:

[tex]m \frac{V^{2}}{R} = mg + ma \to V= \sqrt {(g+a) R }[/tex] ?

Why is that? Am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
PhMichael said:
[tex]m \frac{V^{2}}{R} = mg + ma \to V= \sqrt {(g+a) R }[/tex] ?

What does this equation mean? Is it the correct condition for the bead to reach B? :wink:
 
Obviously it's not correct because the answer is messed up :D , but assuming i didn't know the correct answer i'll say yes, it the the correct one. I don't see where's the problem.

What does this equation means? hmmm ... Isn't it simply the modified 2nd law of Newton in accelerating frames?
 
That equation describes the motion of the bead in the lift frame at the lowest point, given that the bead doesn't experience normal force from the hoop. But that doesn't guarantee the bead can climb up to B :wink:

EDIT: I see something deadly wrong here. At the lowest point, in the lift frame, gravitational force and fictitious force point down, but the centripetal force points up. Normal force cannot be zero.
 
Last edited:
Reagarding the normal force, I really forgot all about it (in addition, I'm given that the hoop is frictionless) ... so the equation should be:

[tex] m \frac{V^{2}}{R} = mg -N + ma [/tex]

and at point B we want it to be: [tex]N \neq 0[/tex] ... but I still have 2 unknows :/
 
PhMichael said:
Reagarding the normal force, I really forgot all about it (in addition, I'm given that the hoop is frictionless) ... so the equation should be:

[tex] m \frac{V^{2}}{R} = mg -N + ma [/tex]

and at point B we want it to be: [tex]N \neq 0[/tex] ... but I still have 2 unknows :/

You got the wrong signs! It should be:
[tex] m \frac{V^{2}}{R} = -mg +N - ma [/tex]
Anyway, this doesn't show any possibility that the bead can go up to B. You may disregard this force method; otherwise, if you continue with it, the equation you get is eventually the same as the energy equation.

P.S.: Some more comments on this. You may repeat the idea that [tex]N \neq 0[/tex] is the condition taken from some other problems, but it does not apply to this problem. We always have [tex]N \neq 0[/tex], as the bead is forced to follow a circular motion.
 
yeah, I used the energy equation at first and got it right but I just wanted to see whether I get the same answer form the force method. So are you saying it's insolvable this way?
 
It's solvable, but it's actually the same as energy method. Here it is:
1 - Because the bead is forced to follow a circular path, the normal force must always satisfy that. In other words, the normal force is determined by the circular motion.
2 - The only thing that matter is that if the component of other forces (i.e. weight & fictitious force) along the hoop can pull the bead down before the bead reaches B. Let [tex]\phi[/tex] denote the angle coordinate of the bead to the horizontal. We have:

[tex]-m(g+a)cos(\phi) = mRd\omega/dt=mR\omega d\omega/d\phi[/tex]

Therefore: [tex]\int_{V/R}^{0}R\omega d\omega = -\int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2}(g+a)cos(\phi)d\phi[/tex]

And that is the same as the energy equation.
 
Last edited:
Hello could you look at ? the post /showthread.php?t=612910
:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K