Bead sliding along wire with constant horizontal velocity -- Shape of wire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the shape of a wire along which a bead slides with a constant horizontal velocity while under the influence of gravity. The initial equations describe the bead's position and the effects of normal force, leading to conditions where the angle of the wire, alpha, can be either zero or π/2. The conversation explores the application of Lagrangian mechanics to derive the necessary differential equations for the wire's shape, emphasizing the need for a specific form of the function y(x). A clarification is made regarding the original problem referenced, which involves maintaining a constant vertical speed as the bead moves along the wire. The participants converge on a method to find the wire's shape that satisfies these conditions.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
The following is exercise 5 from Chapter 4 of Morin's Introduction to Classical Mechanics. There is no solution in the book for these "Exercises", only for "Problems".

A bead, under the influence of gravity, slides along a frictionless wire whose height is given by the function ##y(x)##. Assume that at position ##(x, y) = (0, 0)##, the wire is horizontal and the bead passes this point with a given speed ##v_0## to the right. What should the shape of the wire be (that is, what is y as a function of ##x##) so that the horizontal speed remains ##v_0## at all times? One solution is simply ##y = 0##. Find the other.

There is a footnote:

Solve this exercise in the spirit of Problem 6, that is, by solving a differential equation. Once you get the answer, you’ll see that you could have just written it down without any calculations, based on your knowledge of a certain kind of physical motion.
Relevant Equations
##F=ma##
We start with something like

1708011184846.png


If we suppose the wire is the green line, we are to figure out what the green line looks like to the right of the red bead.

What I first thought of was simply

$$\vec{r}'(t)=x'(t)\hat{i}+y'(t)\hat{j}=v_0\hat{i}+gt\hat{j}\tag{1}$$

$$\vec{r}(t)=x(t)\hat{i}+y(t)\hat{j}=v_0t\hat{i}+\frac{gt^2}{2}\hat{j}\tag{2}$$

Thus, ##\vec{r}(t)## represents the position of the wire.

Then I wanted to solve the problem in a way that would also give me the solution with ##y(t)=0## (and ##x(t)=v_0t##).

The initial solution above assumes there is no normal force at all on the bead from the wire.

If there were a normal force, we'd have

$$mg\hat{j}-\vec{N}=m\vec{a}\tag{3}$$

$$mg\hat{j}-(mg\cos{\alpha}\sin{\alpha}\hat{i}-mg\cos^2{\alpha})=ma_y\hat{j}\tag{4}$$

$$\implies mg\cos{\alpha}\sin{\alpha}=0\tag{5}$$

$$\implies \alpha = 0\ \text{or}\ \frac{\pi}{2}\tag{6}$$

Note that I am defining alpha as follows

1708012288598.png


If ##\alpha=\frac{\pi}{2}## then the normal force is zero altogether, ##mg\hat{j}=ma_y\hat{j}##, and thus ##a_y=g##. There are no forces in the horizontal direction thus no acceleration either.

It seems we can write (1) and go from there.

If ##\alpha=0## then ##\vec{N}=-mg\hat{j}## and the 2nd law becomes ##0\hat{j}=ma_y\hat{j}\implies a_y=0##.

Thus, ##\vec{r}'(t)=v_0\hat{i}## and ##\vec{r}(t)=v_0t\hat{i}##. Thus, in this case, ##y(t)=0##.

My question is if this approach is the one mentioned by the footnote. Is the "differential equation" mentioned there simply the equations involving ##\vec{r}'(t)## that I have used, or is there some other way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can't tell you if that approach is "in the spirit of problem 6" if you don't tell us what problem 6 is; not everyone has access to a copy of your text.

Since the position is contrained to be (x, f(x)) so that the velocity is (\dot x, f&#039;(x) \dot x) I would start with the Lagrangian <br /> L(x, \dot x) = \tfrac12 m(1 + f&#039;(x)^2)\dot x ^2 - mgf(x) and obtain the Euler-Lagrange equation. Then the condition that \dot x = v_0 is constant requires \ddot x = 0. What is left is a differential equation for f subject to f(0) = f&#039;(0) = 0.

EDIT: The other approach, which I think is what you have attempted, is to set \theta as the angle between the tangent to the wire and the horizontal so that \tan \theta = f&#039;(x), and N as the magnitude of the normal reaction force; then the horizontal and vertical components of Newton II are \begin{split}<br /> m\ddot x &amp;= N \sin \theta \\<br /> m \ddot y &amp;= N \cos \theta - mg. \end{split} Now \begin{split}<br /> N \cos \theta \tan \theta &amp;= N \sin \theta \\<br /> (\ddot y+ g)f&#039;(x) &amp;= \ddot x\end{split} is where you want to start from.
 
Last edited:
@pasmith I was confused about which problem was being referred to but now I can see it is the following

A bead, under the influence of gravity, slides along a frictionless wire whose height is given by the function ##y(x)##. Assume that at position ##(x, y) = (0, 0)## the wire is vertical and the bead passes this point with a given speed ##v_0## downward. What should the shape of the wire be (that is, what is ##y## as a function of ##x##) so that the vertical speed remains ##v_0## at all times?

This problem does have a solution in the book.

1708018728071.png


So at this point I think I can see the approach that was intended.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top