Beam Deflection Homework: Missing Moment Calculation for Beam Circled Section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of moments in beam deflection problems, specifically addressing why the moment generated by a 12 kN force at a distance of 9 m is not included in the moment equation. Participants assert that the moment should be considered only for sections where the force acts, emphasizing that the 12 kN force contributes no moment for sections to the left of 9 m. The correct approach involves understanding that the moment is the algebraic sum of moments on one side of the section, which clarifies the omission of the 12(9) kNm term in the moment equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam deflection principles
  • Familiarity with moment calculations in structural analysis
  • Knowledge of algebraic summation of forces and moments
  • Basic concepts of static equilibrium in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of bending moment diagrams
  • Learn about the calculation of reactions and internal forces in beams
  • Explore the concept of moment distribution in structural analysis
  • Review examples of beam deflection problems involving multiple loads
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil engineering, structural engineering, and mechanics who are involved in analyzing beam deflection and moment calculations.

chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


for the circled part, why the why the author didnt include -12(9)kNm moment in the equation of moment ?
[PLAIN]http://imgur.com/a/l3Bu4[URL]http://imgur.com/a/l3Bu4[/URL]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMO, the author should include it in the equation, am i right?
So, M= -258+52<x-0>-(0.5)(8)(<x-0>^2)+50+(0.5)(8)(<x-5>^2)-12(9) ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • 312.jpg
    312.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 470
did the author miss out something?
 
The figure does not include the variable 'x'. But, wherever you put it in the range 0 to 9 m, what contribution to Mx do you think the 12 kN force would make? Recall one definition of moment that it is the algebraic sum of moments on ONE side of a section.
 
pongo38 said:
The figure does not include the variable 'x'. But, wherever you put it in the range 0 to 9 m, what contribution to Mx do you think the 12 kN force would make? Recall one definition of moment that it is the algebraic sum of moments on ONE side of a
section.

The force 12kN only will cause moment at x just 9m, no moment generated at x less than 9m...
But, I still couldn't understand why the moment 12(9) is not included?
 
pongo38 said:
The figure does not include the variable 'x'. But, wherever you put it in the range 0 to 9 m, what contribution to Mx do you think the 12 kN force would make? Recall one definition of moment that it is the algebraic sum of moments on ONE side of a section.
do you mean the x value range from 0 to 9 ? it can't be more than 9 , because there's no moment beyond 9m ?
 
Because the expression for M is the summation of moments to the LEFT of section X, but the 12 kN load is to the right. If you were to write down an expression for the moment to the RIGHT of x, you would get an expression that may at first sight look different, but, if correctly drawn up, will be exactly equivalent (and incidentally acts as a check on whether you have made any mistakes of the kind you are making now). I suggest you try that to reinforce the correct application of the definition of bending moment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K