Beam splitters cubes configurations

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDestroyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary
Stacking beam splitter cubes directly behind one another is acceptable for splitting a laser beam across multiple levels. Each beam splitter will reduce the intensity, so it's important to account for the cumulative loss in calculations. Using non-polarizing beam splitters is recommended to avoid complications with polarization affecting the splitting ratios. This ensures that the intensity remains consistent across the layers. Proper setup and calculations are crucial for achieving the desired beam intensity distribution.
TheDestroyer
Messages
401
Reaction score
1
Hello guys,

I'm not sure this is the right place to ask the question, but I hope someone would have experience with beam splitters cubes.

If I want to split a laser beam over more than one level with more than one beam splitter cube, so the first beam splitter splits to two beams with 50% of the intensity, and then next cube splits the 50% to two 25%. Is it OK if I just stack the beam splitter cubes behind one another with no separators?

Thanks for any efforts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,
Although I don't work on lasers, I live with a Laser Technician and he said:
"Yep...sounds right to me"
 
He also said to keep in mind a small amount of loss each time, and work that into your calculations
 
You should use non-polarizing beam-splitters, otherwise you have to keep track of the polarization or the splitting fractions in the second layer could be wrong.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K