Bending a Beam to Produce Uniform Tension

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of creating a fixture that applies uniform tension to one surface of a rectangular beam. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of bending the beam to achieve this goal, including the necessary equations and conditions for uniform tension and curvature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Mike seeks guidance on determining the equation for the path of deflection needed to apply uniform tension to a beam.
  • Some participants question the meaning of "on one surface," suggesting that tension is typically normal to a surface, while shear is along an outer face.
  • One participant proposes that achieving constant longitudinal tension could be accomplished through an axial traction load or an applied couple.
  • Another participant suggests that bending the beam with constant curvature could be a simpler solution, depending on the available materials and desired outcomes.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of bending the beam around a former to achieve constant curvature, with some participants expressing concerns about this method.
  • One participant emphasizes that a constant tension implies a constant curvature and relates this to the bending moment and the beam's properties, indicating that a couple is necessary for a constant moment.
  • There is speculation about whether "constant across a section" refers to uniform stress distribution in a free body section or in the context of reinforced concrete theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to achieve uniform tension in the beam, with no consensus reached on the most effective method or the interpretation of key terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions and assumptions related to tension, curvature, and the methods proposed for bending the beam. The discussion reflects various interpretations of the problem and the conditions required for uniform tension.

mrh5529
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am attempting to build a fixture which will place uniform tension onto one surface of a rectangular beam. I know that I must force the beam to deflect along a set path, but I am having trouble determining what the equation for this path needs to be. Any guidance on this would be very helpful. Thanks!

Mike
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello mike, welcome to Physics Forums.

You need to explain you intentions in more detail.

What do you mean by "on one surface"?
What surface? A longitudinal tension along an outer face is called shear!

Tension is normal to some surface. Which would that be in your case?

From what I think you mean, a constant longitudinal tension can be developed by

1) An axial traction load

2) An applied couple
 
I wrote a reply, but didn't save it and lost internet connection.

Basically I think it's much more simple than Stuidot alludes to, and also specific to bending.

Putting one face under uniform tension should be as easy as orienting that face away from the center of curvature, then bending with constant curvature.

How you do this depends on what you have available and/or what you want to accomplish. An easy way might be to bend around something that already has constant curvature. If materials and shape might be changing, or if you need specific tension then you'll have to give more details on what you're doing.
 
An easy way might be to bend around something that already has constant curvature.

The OP asked about a beam, not something bent around a former.
 
I didn't think about it in detail, just that it occurred to me as a way to achieve constant curvature in a beam. I imagined pinned ends and pressing the object into the beam. Would this provide difficulty beyond simply applying a load or moment?

Edit- A pin and a roller really so that it's not indeterminate.
 
Last edited:
I think we need to hear from the mike exactly what he means,

I agree that a constant tension implies a constant curvature.
Since the tension is one half of the bending moment couple it implies a constant moment since [itex]\frac{1}{\rho } = \frac{M}{{EI}}[/itex] as we are told the beam has a constant? rectangular cross section.

A constant moment can only be achieved by applying a couple, not a force which subjects the beam to a variable moment depending upon the distance from the force.
This was my method (2) in post #2.

It has occurred to me that by " constant across a section" mike may mean uniform across an exploratory free body section, similar to the stress block we assume for compression in the concrete that we assume in some theories of reincforced concrete.

Alternatively for an isotropic beam that has developed a full plastic moment both the compression and tension stress blocks will be rectangular at the exploratory section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K