Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around identifying the best undergraduate schools for Chemical Engineering (ChemE), focusing on institutions that are not typically highlighted as top-tier, such as MIT or Cal Tech. Participants share personal experiences and opinions on various universities, their rankings, and the reputation of their ChemE programs.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest checking rankings from sources like US News and World Report for insights on ChemE programs.
- One participant highlights the University of Minnesota (UMN) as a well-regarded institution for ChemE, noting its high rankings and strong faculty support.
- Another participant mentions the University of Akron, emphasizing its strong polymer engineering program and competitive rankings compared to top schools.
- Michigan Tech is mentioned as having a good ChemE program with strong ties to chemical companies, providing real-world experience.
- The University of Virginia is noted as a strong option based on a participant's sister's research.
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and California Polytechnic, Pomona are queried for their ChemE programs, with some participants affirming their quality.
- One participant claims that UMN is often ranked in the top 5 for ChemE, with some rankings placing it as high as 1st.
- A participant shares personal experience of applying to RPI for graduate studies but ultimately choosing UMN, suggesting both are reputable institutions.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a variety of opinions on the best ChemE schools, with no consensus reached on a definitive ranking or selection of schools. Multiple competing views on the quality of various programs remain present throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference rankings and personal experiences, but there is no agreement on specific criteria for determining the "best" school, and the discussion reflects a range of subjective evaluations.