Best Mash-up, "hard" SciFi and Fantasy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fantasy Hard Scifi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "hard" science fiction and its mash-up with fantasy elements. Participants explore definitions, examples, and the feasibility of combining these genres, with a focus on both theoretical and narrative aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek suggestions for works that blend hard science fiction with fantasy elements, noting the broad nature of the topic.
  • There is a discussion about the definitions of "hard" science fiction and what constitutes a mash-up, with some suggesting that "hard" sci-fi adheres closely to known scientific principles.
  • Examples like "Star Wars" and "Dune" are mentioned, but some argue they do not fit the criteria of hard science fiction due to their fantastical elements.
  • One participant emphasizes that for a successful mash-up, both genres must compromise, suggesting that a perfect blend may not be achievable.
  • Another participant proposes that a story could start as hard science fiction and transition into fantasy, or that magic could be explained as advanced technology.
  • Books such as the "Nights Dawn" trilogy by Peter F. Hamilton and titles by Eric Nylund and Piers Anthony are suggested as potential examples of the desired mash-up.
  • A suggestion is made to shift the focus of the discussion to ideal sci-fi/fantasy crossovers, potentially disregarding strict definitions.
  • Participants express differing views on the definitions and boundaries of hard science fiction, leading to some confusion and debate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions of "hard" science fiction or the feasibility of a successful mash-up with fantasy. Multiple competing views remain regarding what constitutes a valid example of the genres combined.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in definitions and the subjective nature of genre classification are acknowledged, with some participants noting that the blending of hard science fiction and fantasy may inherently involve contradictions.

Noisy Rhysling
Messages
999
Reaction score
345
Suggestions, please. The subject may be broad, so don't be afraid to put something out for us to consider.

(I'm asking because I haven't really been in the genre in the past few decades.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean "hard" and by mash-up, you mean crossover?
 
ProfuselyQuarky said:
What do you mean "hard" and by mash-up, you mean crossover?
"The Martian" counts as "hard scifi" for me, wile LOTR is "pure fantasy.) (This may be an artifact from the '70s. (I remember that decade only vaguely.))

mash-up
  1. a mixture or fusion of disparate elements.
Thus we might have a space-faring race encountering a species of alien who apparently can do magic.
 
Okay, I see people may be having a hard time with this, so I'll pop out one or a few that are current.

Star Wars, a blend of spaceships and mystical forces.

Dune. Same again. Or is it?
 
But neither of those are "hard" sci-fi. Hard science fiction attempts to keep its science close to known science. Fantasy, by it's very definition, is the exploration of the fantastic.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
But neither of those are "hard" sci-fi. Hard science fiction attempts to keep its science close to known science. Fantasy, by it's very definition, is the exploration of the fantastic.
In order for both to be in a book each has to give way to some extent. The starships in Star Wars are based on science. The force is based on ... something else. Dune gets fuzzy with the precognition and, perhaps, the bending of space.
 
Interstellar was very scientifically accurate. They took into account the relativistic effects near a black hole and used a wormhole to travel through space instead of somehow traveling faster than c like they did in "Guardians of the Galaxy" and many other science fiction movies. I would strongly recommend it.
 
Noisy Rhysling said:
In order for both to be in a book each has to give way to some extent. The starships in Star Wars are based on science. The force is based on ... something else. Dune gets fuzzy with the precognition and, perhaps, the bending of space.

But the starships in Star Wars are not hard science. They have visible laser weapons, FTL engines, force fields, artificial gravity etcetera. None of that fits within the hard SciFi genre.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
But the starships in Star Wars are not hard science. They have visible laser weapons, FTL engines, force fields, artificial gravity etcetera. None of that fits within the hard SciFi genre.
As I said, mash-up have to compromise. I'm not looking for a perfect meld of the two genres, I don't know that such is possible.
 
  • #10
Noisy Rhysling said:
As I said, mash-up have to compromise. I'm not looking for a perfect meld of the two genres, I don't know that such is possible.

I can't think how it would even be possible, unless something started out as hard SF and switched to fantasy or if it was seemingly a fantasy setting but the magic was an artifact of hard-SF technology. The genres are very different, contradictory even.
 
  • #11
Ryan_m_b said:
I can't think how it would even be possible, unless something started out as hard SF and switched to fantasy or if it was seemingly a fantasy setting but the magic was an artifact of hard-SF technology. The genres are very different, contradictory even.
The movies and/or books I mentioned don't fit the bill for you?
 
  • #12
I have a perfect set of books for you.
Try reading the Nights Dawn trilogy by Peter F Hamilton.

Starts out as hard(ish) Sci Fi (they do have jump drives though but at least everything is self consistent)
and then
Part way through the first book people start getting possessed by the dead. The possessed have the ability to change what people see and shoot lightning bolts and such.
 
  • #13
Noisy Rhysling said:
The movies and/or books I mentioned don't fit the bill for you?

No...because they aren't hard science fiction.
 
  • #14
Seems we're getting stuck on definitions. So, "anything close to a mashup of hard science fiction and fantasy" you can recommend?
 
  • #15
Noisy Rhysling said:
Seems we're getting stuck on definitions. So, "anything close to a mashup of hard science fiction and fantasy" you can recommend?
Maybe these?
A Game of Universe - Eric Nylund
Bio of a Space Tyrant - Piers Anthony
 
  • #16
I'll look into them. I like Anthony, most of the time.
 
  • #17
Why not change the question? Why not ask for everybody’s ideal SciFi/fantasy crossover? Perhaps disregard the definitions of “hard” and accurate science fiction. Like, what two characters from two different stories would you like to see meet?
 
  • #18
ProfuselyQuarky said:
Why not change the question? Why not ask for everybody’s ideal SciFi/fantasy crossover? Perhaps disregard the definitions of “hard” and accurate science fiction. Like, what two characters from two different stories would you like to see meet?
I have no problem with that. Thanks for the suggestion.
 
  • #19
William Vasiladiotis said:
Interstellar was very scientifically accurate. They took into account the relativistic effects near a black hole and used a wormhole to travel through space instead of somehow traveling faster than c like they did in "Guardians of the Galaxy" and many other science fiction movies. I would strongly recommend it.

I'm particularly fond of how they handled wormhole travel in Babylon 5, where they used what might be a communal wormhole, or perhaps and alternate universe, to fulfill their FTL needs.

The inevitable dilemma with hard-science stories that allow for FTL (and for this post FTL stands for any scheme used to get from here to Alpha Centuri in the next few days instead of the next few centuries) is that any society that has FTL is going to have a take on physics and technology that will make some, if not most, hard science fiction ideas and tropes mute. In such a place at least some of our ideas on physics will be seriously modified or discredited. The interesting trick to me would be figuring out which ideas have been discredited and what they have been replaced with.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K