Best position for a cockpit? (in a spaceship doing high G maneuvers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spacetraveler73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Position Spaceship
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the optimal placement of a cockpit in a spaceship designed for high G maneuvers. Participants debate whether positioning the cockpit in the center of the ship would offer advantages, such as reduced exposure to G-forces and better protection from radiation, compared to traditional front placements. Comparisons are made to submarines and the importance of center of rotation for minimizing the effects of acceleration on occupants. The conversation also touches on the implications of cockpit design, including the absence of windows and the potential for immersion techniques to mitigate G-forces. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that central placement could enhance safety and control during maneuvers.
Spacetraveler73
Messages
3
Reaction score
5
I'm currently reading the expanse and thinking a lot about how the spaceships are built.
As far as I understand, the cockpit and control room sit on top of the ship (with the ships beeing built like skyscrapers).
Now since there are no windows, I feel like the cockpit doesn't need to be in the front. Wouldn't it make more sense to put the cockpit in the middle of the ship? It would be closer to the center of rotation and maybe even better protected.
Anyone know enough about how G-Forces work in space to comment on this?

(Please no spoilers for the expanse, I'm only on book 2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacetraveler73 said:
maybe even better protected.
protection from what
 
256bits said:
protection from what
I don't know. Spacial transmitted deseases? Scratch that part with better protection, that wasn't really what I was searching an answer for.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes hmmm27, DaveE, berkeman and 1 other person
Conventional rockets have the payload at the top of the skyscraper. The fuel and engines make up the rear-er part. That makes sense with the present technology of getting vehicle into space.
An aircraft cockpit is in the front with windows. At lot of times the pilots do not use the windows for navigation, in fact most of it is from reading off of instruments, or even 'self flying' mode.
Probably, what we know is projected onto other situations, in this case a spacecraft .

You could compare a spacecraft with a submarine, or a sea faring ship.
Where are those cockpits?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Spacetraveler73
256bits said:
You could compare a spacecraft with a submarine, or a sea faring ship.
Where are those cockpits?
Yeah, the comparison with a submarine is how I'd imagine it would make sense. Since the rockers don't split their propulsion system off but stay a skyscraper/tube and the engine only takes up the rear part of the ship.
Since there is no need for windows, like in a submarine, it isn't a concerning factor in positioning the cockpit. But the G forces still are.
I guess my question is if it is better to be sitting closer or further away from the center of rotation when doing high G maneuvers with a tube in space?
 
Well, with linear acceleration, F = ma, it shouldn't matter the location. All locations on the ship experience the same linear acceleration.
With passive orbital motion around say a planet it shouldn't make much of a difference --> zero-G situation.

So, one would have to consider a rotation about an axis, or axes, and the distance of the cockpit to the axis of rotation, and the effect upon the occupants, and their possessions, such as a cup of coffee. Of course, in space under zero-G conditions, one doesn't drink put of a cup of coffee, perhaps a bag of coffee instead, but you get the point I think, what would happen to that cup of coffee if it isn't nailed down when doing a rotation manoeuvre.
Air force pilots, as you know can go through high G's on some of their manoeuvres, such as coming out of a dive. Here the whole plane experience high G's as it courses through the arc.

A space ship would have to produce an arc like an airplane goes through with thrusters, rather than the lift from 'wings'. No atmosphere to ride on in space.
Would they do that.
Not too sure it would.
I would think what a practical spacecraft would do would be to first change its orientation - > a rotation about a central axis, and then fire a main thruster to change direction. So we are back to a linear acceleration.

The question then is asking about the change in orientation of the spacecraft and cockpit location.
If you know anything about centripetal acceleration, you may be able to answer your own question.
Any flaws in my argument so far are welcome.
 
Spacetraveler73 said:
It would be closer to the center of rotation and maybe even better protected.

256bits said:
protection from what
Locating the 'cockpit' near the center of the vessel would potentially protect people from radiation better than having the cockpit near one end. Especially if you have large fuel tanks or water tanks surrounding the cockpit. A few meters of liquid protects far better than a few cm (or less) of aluminum or some other metal, at least until the tanks are drained.
 
Drakkith said:
specially if you have large fuel tanks
I don't think I want my cockpit in the middle of a bunch of fuel tanks... :wink:
 
berkeman said:
I don't think I want my cockpit in the middle of a bunch of fuel tanks... :wink:
No worries. If your fuel tanks explode in space, it's not going to matter that much if you're inside them or in front of them. You'll either die a quick death, a slightly slower death, or a much slower death (you survive the explosion but now you have no fuel to maneuver).
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes Algr, 256bits and russ_watters
  • #10
Drakkith said:
No worries. If your fuel tanks explode in space, it's not going to matter that much if you're inside them or in front of them. You'll either die a quick death, a slightly slower death, or a much slower death (you survive the explosion but now you have no fuel to maneuver).
Thank you Mr. Sunshine! :wideeyed:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes phinds, 256bits and Vanadium 50
  • #11
Drakkith said:
No worries. If your fuel tanks explode in space, it's not going to matter that much if you're inside them or in front of them. You'll either die a quick death, a slightly slower death, or a much slower death (you survive the explosion but now you have no fuel to maneuver).
That's the reason why I liked submarines for the Navy.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #12
Spacetraveler73 said:
the cockpit and control room
The term 'cockpit' comes from aircrafts and it means - well: a cockpit. With windows.
If you put it inside the vehicle, then it's no longer called a cockpit, but rather a steering station/room or something like that and better to switch to the terminology of battleships or submarines instead (with a CIC deep in the armoured sections of the ship).
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #13
Rive said:
and it means - well: a cockpit.
Cockpit: An arena where angry chickens fight.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Hornbein, berkeman and Rive
  • #14
Boats have cockpits; ships have bridges.
 
  • #15
Ref Bridge

As boats became bigger steering from the rear got harder ... big paddle steamers had a metal bridge/walkway that spanned the paddle wheel covers ... hence the origin of the term Bridge!

Centre of mass is usually close to centre of rotation ... best place to put a cockpit / bridge on a space ship pulling high g etc
 
  • #16
Let's say you want to have maximum maneuverability while the drive is unidirectional. You'd want the human to be at the center of rotation with the control room on gimbals so that it doesn't rotate at all while the ship is rotating like crazy.

Would it help to have the room filled with water to resist G forces?
 
  • #17
Goin' on the way of the good old Acceleration Shells?

Yes, immersion is expected to help, but breathing and the internal density differences within the human body are still inconvenient limiting factors.
 
  • #18
Remembering an English Channel ferry crossing that became very unpleasant...
I headed for the upper decks, found a location close enough to centre-line that the ship sorta rotated around me with scant 'pitch & toss'.

By analogy with 'Occam's Razor', I'd reduced the variables to 'rock & roll' which, given sight of horizon, were bearable. Rest of family stayed below decks, suffered variously. After the ferry docked, I was the only one fit to drive for several hours....
 
  • #19
Nik_2213 said:
Remembering an English Channel ferry crossing that became very unpleasant...
I headed for the upper decks, found a location close enough to centre-line that the ship sorta rotated around me with scant 'pitch & toss'.

By analogy with 'Occam's Razor', I'd reduced the variables to 'rock & roll' which, given sight of horizon, were bearable. Rest of family stayed below decks, suffered variously. After the ferry docked, I was the only one fit to drive for several hours....
Top three rules for avoiding seasickness:
  1. Sit where you can see the horizon.
  2. Keep your eye on the horizon.
  3. Sit where you can see the horizon and keep your eye on it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Nik_2213, DrClaude and Bystander
  • #20
DaveC426913 said:
  1. Sit where you can see the horizon.
  2. Keep your eye on the horizon.
  3. Sit where you can see the horizon and keep your eye on it.
I once had to shoot video while on a yacht. I got sea sick, and also quite sunburnt. And it was part of an internship so I didn't even get paid.
 
  • #21
IIRC, astronauts do a lot of 'free-fall' / 'vomit-comet' training, but their tolerance does not fully transfer to actual orbit. I've read that the first week or two on orbit may be 'sub-optimal'.
So, beyond intensive training and 'g-suits', I would expect even your hardened space-combat pilots would have medication to help 'disassociate' inner-ear from eye-cues...

Um, beyond putting the pilot in a 'sarcophagus' flotation tank, make medium a thixotropic gel ? Preferably a type which may be swiftly electrically gelled / fluidised to anticipate shocks / violent course-changes...

Or send more missiles...
 
  • #22
Algr said:
Cockpit: An arena where angry chickens fight.
I live on an island where cockfighting is the dominant sport. The cockpits have seating for hundreds. Cocks are kept in wicker cages next to public thoroughfares so they'll get used to being around people, so you see them all the time. Men gather in the streets in groups rubbing their cocks. Cockfighting is illegal but some other nosy island made that law so nobody cares and it continues unabated.

I must say that these roosters have very stylish feathers. Cat fur isn't in the same league.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
505
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top