Beta functions and relevant/irrelevant operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the distinctions between relevant, marginally relevant, irrelevant, and marginally irrelevant operators in the context of beta functions and differential equations. The example provided illustrates how the beta function for the coupling g_s indicates asymptotic freedom, with a negative beta function suggesting either irrelevance or marginal irrelevance. The confusion arises in determining why the coupling becomes marginally relevant at lower energy scales rather than simply relevant. The comparison between Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is highlighted to clarify these concepts. Ultimately, the thread seeks to elucidate the criteria for categorizing theories based on their behavior under renormalization group flow.
eherrtelle59
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm having some conceptual difficulty here. When discussing beta functions and the relation how these differential equations flow, I still don't quite get the difference between relevant vs. marginally relevant and irrelevant vs. marginally irrelevant.

For instance, take the β function with coupling g_s

\frac{dg^2_s}{d\ln M} = -\frac{14}{16\pi^2}g^4_s

The solution is \frac{1}{g^2_s}=\frac{14}{16\pi^2} \ln(M/M')
such that the theory diverges at M'. The theory's obviously asymptotically free, as when the scale M grows, the coupling g_s decreases.

So, since the beta function is negative, I know this is either irrelevant or marginally irrelevant. What's the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I'm wrong above.

At lower and lower energy scales M, g becomes larger and larger and therefore relevant. Why is it marginally relevant instead of relevant?
 
In case I'm being to obscure above, let's just work with QED vs. QCD.

How do you know these theories are marginally (ir)relevant as opposed to (ir)relevant?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K