Between any two distinct real numbers there is a rational number

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that between any two distinct real numbers, there exists a rational number. The participants are exploring inequalities involving rational numbers and the Archimedean property in the context of real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish inequalities involving a rational number p/q that lies between two real numbers x and y. There is a focus on determining conditions for q and how to select p accordingly. Questions arise regarding the necessity of q(y-x) being greater than 1 and how to ensure the existence of such a p.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and attempting to clarify the steps needed to prove the existence of a rational number between x and y. Some guidance has been offered regarding the selection of q and the implications for p, but there is still uncertainty about the specific choices and proofs required.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on proving the existence of certain values rather than calculating them directly.

jrsweet
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let x and y be real numbers with x<y and write an inequality involving a rational
number p/q capturing what we need to prove. Multiply everything in your inequality by q,
then explain why this means you want q to be large enough so that q(y-x)>1 . Explain
how you can rewrite this inequality and use the Archimedean property to find such a q.

The Attempt at a Solution


So, this is a question on a worksheet our teacher gave us to go along with the theorem in the book. Here is what I did so far:

x < p/q < y
Then multiply both sides by q as the question states:
qx < p < yq
0 < p-qx < yq-qx
0 < p-qx < q(y-x)

I am having trouble seeing why q(y-x)>1. It is obviously great than zero as the inequality states, but can someone help me see why it has to be >1??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are trying to do is exhibit a rational number [tex]p/q[/tex] between [tex]x[/tex] and [tex]y[/tex], that is, to choose [tex]p[/tex] and [tex]q[/tex] so that [tex]x < p/q < y[/tex]. The argument you're being led down is a strategy for choosing [tex]q[/tex], then [tex]p[/tex], so that they satisfy the conditions you want.

So, what you need to do is:
1. prove that you can choose [tex]q[/tex] so that [tex]q(y - x) > 1[/tex], i.e., prove that such a [tex]q[/tex] exists; then
2. figure out why that means that you can choose [tex]p[/tex] so that [tex]0 < p - qx < q(y - x)[/tex], i.e., give a proof that if you have [tex]q[/tex] satisfying part 1 then such a [tex]p[/tex] exists.
 
So, we chose q>1/(y-x)?

So then,
0 < p-(x/(y-x)) < 1
0 < p < (y/(y-x))

I'm still lost on how we choose p then.
 
You need to give one sentence (really, one phrase) of proof for why one can choose [tex]q > 1/(y - x)[/tex].

Now you need [tex]p[/tex] to satisfy [tex]0 < p - qx < q(y - x)[/tex]. Rewrite this as [tex]qx < p < qy[/tex]. You need to find an integer [tex]p[/tex] satisfying this inequality. Why does your choice of [tex]q[/tex] guarantee that there is at least one such [tex]p[/tex]? (This is the only condition you need [tex]p[/tex] to satisfy!)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K