Bhabha Scattering: Relative Sign Difference & Fermi Statistics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter guestspeaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relative sign difference in Bhabha scattering diagrams, specifically addressing the influence of Fermi statistics. Participants reference Peskin and Schroeder's work, particularly section 4.7, which illustrates similar concepts in Yukawa theory. The conversation highlights the necessity of Wick contractions for understanding the signs in s- and t-channel diagrams, emphasizing that the negative sign arises from the antisymmetrization of final states and the reordering of fermion operators. The trivial nature of the calculations involved is noted, with a focus on the importance of Feynman rules in deriving these results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi statistics
  • Familiarity with Wick contractions
  • Knowledge of Feynman diagrams, specifically s- and t-channel processes
  • Access to Peskin and Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the section on Yukawa theory in Peskin and Schroeder for insights on sign differences
  • Learn about the implications of antisymmetrization in quantum field theory
  • Explore the role of fermion loops and their contribution to sign factors in calculations
  • Review Feynman rules for constructing and interpreting Feynman diagrams
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of particle interactions and the mathematical frameworks that govern them.

guestspeaker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I cannot figure out why there is a relative sign difference between the two diagrams for bhabha scattering. Fermi statistics is at play here but I don't see how that affects the relative sign between 2 different diagrams...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work through the Wick contractions carefully. If you have a copy of Peskin and Schroeder handy, in section 4.7 they do exactly this for an example in Yukawa theory that is similar to Bhabha scattering.
 
The example in P&S is with t- and u-channel diagrams, for which the negative sign can come from a "heuristic" argument of antisymmetrization of the final states.

But for Bhabha scattering, the diagrams are s- and t-channel... is there a similar heuristic argument without resorting to the Wick contractions?
 
I thought you wanted to understand where the heuristic argument involving Fermi statistics came from. The diagrams are simply shorthand for the processes, including the Wick contractions; "resorting" to the latter is necessary to understand the former.

Besides, it's a pretty trivial calculation; it took me three lines to check the signs of the Bhabha diagrams, and should only have taken two.
 
okay okay :) I was hoping for something immediately obvious from just the diagrams (like the -1 for fermion loop etc.)
 
guestspeaker said:
okay okay :) I was hoping for something immediately obvious from just the diagrams (like the -1 for fermion loop etc.)

I was wondering whether to mention the fermion loop, because its (-1) factor also comes from anticommuting the fermion operators to untangle the contractions! It's not something that I can derive from the diagram in isolation (without reference to the Feynman rules), it's just so trivial a calculation that it's easy to remember how it goes.PS. Where are my manners? Welcome to Physics Forums! Hope you stick around.
 
the relative minus sign comes from the fact that you must reorder your fermion operators relative the different diagrams when you make the contraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
832
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K