Doubt about Bhabha scattering.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arroy_0205
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bhabha scattering involves the interaction between an electron (e-) and a positron (e+), two oppositely charged particles. Despite their attraction due to opposite charges, they can either scatter or annihilate, as described in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). The interaction can be represented by two Feynman diagrams: one for annihilation and another for scattering via a virtual photon. Both processes must be considered to accurately calculate the interaction's amplitude and cross-section, as they contribute to the overall rate of the interaction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Feynman diagrams
  • Knowledge of particle interactions, specifically electron-positron interactions
  • Basic concepts of virtual particles and photon exchange
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Feynman diagrams related to particle interactions
  • Explore the concept of virtual photons in QED
  • Research the annihilation process in detail, referencing Peskin and Schroeder's book on Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of scattering amplitudes in QED
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in particle physics, particularly those studying electron-positron interactions and QED.

arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I have one doubt about Bhabha scattering which is scattering between one electron and one positron, two oppositely charged particles. Why should they scatter each other away rather than attract and eventually annihilate themselves, giving rise to the pair annihilation process? (This process is dealth with in for example, Peskin-Scroeder's book on QFT). But I do not understand when they would annihilate and when they would scatter each other. Both are described in QED, by exchange of photon. But in one case there is attraction in the other, there is repulsion. How is that possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arroy_0205 said:
I have one doubt about Bhabha scattering which is scattering between one electron and one positron, two oppositely charged particles. Why should they scatter each other away rather than attract and eventually annihilate themselves, giving rise to the pair annihilation process? (This process is dealth with in for example, Peskin-Scroeder's book on QFT). But I do not understand when they would annihilate and when they would scatter each other. Both are described in QED, by exchange of photon. But in one case there is attraction in the other, there is repulsion. How is that possible?

Firstly, let's make one thing clear: e- and e+ always "attract" each other for they carry opposite charge. A system with an e- and e+ is basically the positronium. "scattering" is just a term to say there is an interaction. Now from QED, there are two possible diagrams that contribute to this (ie. two diagrams with the same initial and final states): one is what you call the annihilation diagram and the other one is the "direct"/"standard" one (strictly speaking you can call it what you want). So when you wish to work out the amplitude/cross-section for this interaction, QED is telling you that there are two ways via which this can happen so you need to consider them both to get the total rate. Namely, e- and e+ go close to each other an interact via a virtual photon or they annihilate each other first then reappear again. NB: you final states e- and e+ will still be attracted to each other via the electromagnetic force. So interpreting that there is a repulsion may be a bit misleading for the "direct" case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K