Big bang in Robertson - Walker space - time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Space Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Robertson-Walker metric in the context of the big bang, specifically focusing on the calculation of curvature properties through the Ricci tensor and the interpretation of singularities in the manifold.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the expression R^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu } and questions whether R(0) = 0 can be interpreted as the moment of the big bang, linking it to infinite curvature in the manifold.
  • Another participant suggests that since curvature invariants diverge at R(t_0) = 0, it is reasonable to treat t_0 as the origin of the time coordinate, noting that the singularity at r = 0 is merely a coordinate singularity.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether r = 0 refers to the scale factor or the radial coordinate, confirming it refers to the radial coordinate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of singularities and the nature of the curvature at r = 0, indicating that multiple competing views remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of singularities and the interpretation of curvature invariants, which may depend on the definitions used and the context of the metric.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
553
Hey guys. I was looking at the Robertson - Walker metric and went about calculating R^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu } as a way of looking at coordinate independent curvature properties through the Ricci Tensor. Considering I did it correctly I ended up with:

R^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu } = \frac{1}{R(t)^{2}}[9\ddot{R} + 3\frac{(\ddot{R}R + 2\dot{R}^{2} + 2k)^{2}}{R(t)^{2}}]

Where R(t) is the scale factor, k is the spatial curvature index, and dots denote time derivatives. So if R(0) = 0 is taken to be the origin then can it be interpreted as being that moment right at the big bang? I ask this because the big bang is said to be a real, geometric singularity and in this coordinate - invariant expression R(0) = 0 induces infinite curvature in the manifold. Also, what would r = 0 mean in the manifold (r being the radial coordinate as defined by the metric) since it doesn't really show up in this expression (if I did it right of course!)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the scale factor evolves with time and curvature invariants (the Ricci scalar would be a more obvious choice) diverge at R(t_0)=0, it makes sense to treat t_0 as the origin of the time coordinate. This can always be achieved by a constant shift in time. The singularity at r=0 is just a coordinate singularity, analogous to the same one in polar coordinates for Cartesian space. Curvature invariants don't do anything special there.
 
I'm sorry when you say r = 0 do you mean the scale factor or just the radial coordinate?
 
WannabeNewton said:
I'm sorry when you say r = 0 do you mean the scale factor or just the radial coordinate?

The radial coordinate.
 
Ok thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
910
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K