Big Bang Nucleosynthesis; electron-photon ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Photon
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Homework Statement
See the image below!
Relevant Equations
N/A
1716060066146.png


I'm asking mainly about part (c). Within the context of BBN, I'm a little unsure how you account for different baryons (i.e. does ##n_b## include neutrons, protons, hydrogen and helium, given that helium itself contains both neutrons and protons?)

For completeness, for part (b) I would just use the non-relativistic number density expression for electrons (given that ##T < m_e##) and the relativistic one for photons:\begin{align*}
n_{e} &= 2\left( \frac{m_e T}{2\pi} \right)^{3/2} e^{-m_e/T} \\
n_{\gamma} &= \frac{2\zeta(3)}{\pi^2} T^3
\end{align*}and take the ratio.

So coming back to (c), we have derived elsewhere that ##n_{\mathrm{He}}/n_{\mathrm{H}} \sim 1/16##. What should I write for the baryon number ##n_b##? At this point I would have thought almost all neutrons be inside helium nuclei, but the question hints not to ignore terms of order ##n_n/n_p##.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top