Albert1
- 1,221
- 0
The discussion centers around the geometric proposition of whether a square can be composed of five smaller squares, specifically analyzing a configuration involving an inner square and four outer squares of varying sizes. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and geometric proofs.
Participants appear to agree on the conclusion that the inner square has zero area and that the large square is divided into four congruent squares. However, the humorous tone suggests a light-hearted approach rather than a formal consensus on the impossibility of the configuration.
The discussion does not address potential assumptions or limitations regarding the definitions of squares or the implications of having an inner square with zero area.
The four outer squares have sides $a,b,c,d$ as shown.Prove that it is impossible for a square to be composed
of five smaller square as shown.
Code:a b *-----*---------* | | | a | | | b | | Q | | P*---*-----* | | | | *-----*---*R | | S | | | | | c d | | | | | | | | | *---------*-----* d c
Still a square! (Tongueout)soroban said:The inner square has zero area.
soroban :well done !soroban said:Hence, the large square is divided into four congruent squares.
The inner square has zero area. (Tongueout)