Hey folks,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm reading "Symmetry in Mechanics" by S. Singer and I'm stuck on an exercise. It asks to find an antisymmetric bilinear form on [tex]R^4[/tex] that cannot be written as a wedge product of two covectors.

Here are my thoughts thus far: on [tex]R^2[/tex] its trivial to show that every antisymmetric bilinear form (ABF) is the product of two covectors. I just let F be an ABF and put in two vectors, v & w and expanded them in terms of a basis [tex]e_i[/tex]. I get something like:

[tex]F(e_1,e_2)(v_1w_2-v_2w_1)[/tex] which easily maps into [tex]F(e_1,e_2)dx\wedge dy[/tex] and you can split up the wedge anyway you'd like to, to make two covectors whose wedge gives the same result as F.

Now on [tex]R^3[/tex] are a little more complicated and I have a question about that as well. If I look at [tex]F(v,w)[/tex] where [tex]v,w\in R^3[/tex] and expand it in a basis [tex]e_i[/tex] I get what you'd expect, a cross product looking expression. Now if I also take the wedge product of two 1-forms on [tex]R^3[/tex], say [tex]\alpha,\beta[/tex] where [tex]\alpha = \alpha_idx^i[/tex] and [tex]\beta=\beta_idx^i[/tex] I get a 2-form with the coefficients you'd expect (they look like the components from a cross product).

Now the expansion of the ABF, F, using the basis [tex]e_i[/tex]gives me that cross product looking thing, but with some additional constants which I denote as:

[tex]F(e_i,e_j)=F_{ij}[/tex]. If I wish to take that ABF and associate it to a product of covectors I thought I could just equate coeffcients and solve. If I do that I get the following system:

[tex]\alpha_1\beta_2-\alpha_2\beta_1=F_{12}[/tex]

[tex]\alpha_2\beta_3-\alpha_3\beta_2=F_{23}[/tex]

[tex]\alpha_1\beta_3-\alpha_3\beta_1=F_{13}[/tex]

If i suppose that I pick my [tex]\alpha_k[/tex] first I get a matrix that's inconsistent. But of course I'm doing something stupid here because you're supposed to be able to associate ABF with wedge products of covectors in [tex]R^3[/tex].

So as you can see, I'm lost. I'd appreciate some direction.

Many thanks,

Kevin

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bilinear forms and wedge products

Loading...

Similar Threads - Bilinear forms wedge | Date |
---|---|

I Some Question on Differential Forms and Their Meaningfulness | Feb 19, 2018 |

A Exterior forms in wiki page | Dec 22, 2017 |

I Integration of a one form | Nov 5, 2017 |

Prove a metric is bilinear | Jun 30, 2015 |

Show that a bilinear form is an inner product | Mar 20, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**