brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,750
- 8
BicycleTree said:Come on--a few cents a bolt, a couple seconds for a machine to fasten it.
Yup. Maybe a cent for a bolt, 2 seconds to fasten. Maybe 50, 500, 50,000 bolts per products. Maybe $25 million for a dedicated bolt do-er-up-er machine. Maybe 4 of these machines at every station...
I don't know numbers, but I'll try and find you a coherent example. Anyway, the point is, seemingly small differences in the design can make massive cost savings for the manufacturer, which can mostly go un-noticed by the customer.
If most companies follow the strategy of producing to sell again when the product breaks, then you wouldn't not buy again from the same manufacturer just because your product wears out earlier than the company could have made it to. The product would be wearing out at a time you've come to accept as normal.
Well you might, it depends on individual customers, the product in question, and the particular circumstances. But this is the thing, all products have a designed life-span, and there are always products which fail prematurely because a manufacturer can't cover all bases. Is this 'evil' in its purest form? I don't think so.
Both sides believed they were doing good.