Binary Detection in Gaussian Noise

weetabixharry
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
I have a vector signal, [itex]\underline{x}(t)[/itex], which is afflicted with Gaussian noise [itex]\underline{n}(t)[/itex]. I take a finite number, [itex]L[/itex], of discrete observations and (based on those observations) want to determine whether:

(1) Only Gaussian noise is present, [itex]\left[\text{i.e. } \underline{x}(t) = \underline{n}(t)\right][/itex]
(2) Gaussian noise plus a "non-noise" term, [itex]\underline{a}m(t)[/itex], are both present. [itex]\left[\text{i.e. } \underline{x}(t) = \underline{a}m(t) + \underline{n}(t)\right][/itex]

The scalar, [itex]m(t)[/itex], is zero-mean and has unknown power (variance). The elements of [itex]\underline{x}(t)[/itex] are independent of each other and also independent of [itex]m(t)[/itex].

Given my observations, how can I estimate the probability that the signal is present?

Many thanks for any help!
 
on Phys.org
Hey weetabixharry.

I'm not an expert, but I do recall the subject of Kalman filters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalman_filter

Basically you should check out these kind of things where you prefix a structure for your information that assumes some noise model (like White Gaussian) and then uses a filter to not only detect noise, but also the actual non-noisy information.

There are also non-linear variants of the filter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K