Binary Star Explosion: Calculating Total Energy and Period

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total energy, angular momentum, and period of a binary star system before and after an explosion. Participants are exploring how to derive these values using gravitational equations and concepts of potential and kinetic energy. There is confusion regarding the calculations of total energy and period, particularly when transitioning from the binary system to an equivalent single particle system. The importance of understanding the relationship between force and potential energy through gradients is also emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of binary star dynamics and the need for clarity in calculations.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two individual stars in a binary system (m1=mo, m2=2mo) are in circular orbit about their common centre of mass and are separated by a distance ro. At some stage, the more massive star explodes - resulting in the two stars having equal mass after the explosion

(a)Calculate the total energy, angular momentum and period of the binary star as viewed in the ZMF before the collision.

(b)Calculate the total energy and period of the equivalent single particle system orbit, before the explosion.

(c) Using the equivalent single particle system or otherwise, show that the binary star will remain bound after the explosion.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(a)

So is the total energy just the sum of the energy for each star?

I defined PE to equal 0 at one star and found total energy = -Gmo^2/ro

How do you do it for angular momentum? Just find the two individually, note they are in opposite direction, and add?

I worked out T = 2/3 pi ro / (1/3 Gmo/ro)^1/2 Is this right?

(b) I am using F int = ur'' where u is reduced mass, r relative position vector..

Using this method i get E total to be -1/3 Gmo^2/ro..which isn't equal to the above, why?

Also I get T = 2/3pi ro / (Gmo/ro)^1/2 which again isn't equal to the above.. :S

(c) Not sure how to do this...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with the two individual bodies first. They interact, and there is no external force. Choose a system of reference with the centre of mass as origin.

Both planets orbit around the CM along their individual circles, but with the same angular velocity. What are the radii? What is that angular velocity?

What is the KE of the whole system?

As for the potential energy of a system of material points, take into mind, that the negative gradient of the potential energy is the force, and the gradient is a function of the coordinates of both bodies. It can be shown for this binary system that PE =-(G m1 m2 )/r0. It is zero when the stars are at infinite distance apart, not at one star, where r0=0.

The angular momentum is m r^2 w at a circular orbit, but it is not opposite for the individual stars. Would the CM stay in rest if they move in opposite direction?

As for the equivalent single particle system, you have a "reduced" or "effective" mass u= 2/3 m0, orbiting around a mass of 3 m0. Calculate angular velocity, energy and angular momentum according to this.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah ok this is really helpful thanks. For now, just stuck on one bit of what you say about potential energy.

So i know that for the start with mass 2mo, F = Gmo(2mo)/ro^2

so the PE is the -grad of this.but how do i take -grad of F? I haven't done grad in polar coords yet.. :S

Thanks
 
bon said:
Ah ok this is really helpful thanks. For now, just stuck on one bit of what you say about potential energy.

So i know that for the start with mass 2mo, F = Gmo(2mo)/ro^2

so the PE is the -grad of this.but how do i take -grad of F? I haven't done grad in polar coords yet.. :S

Thanks

No, the FORCE can be obtained by taking the gradient of the potential energy. Taking the gradient makes a vector from a scalar and force is a vector and potential energy is a scalar.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K