Finding the mass of a planet is a binary system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of each star in Plaskett's binary system can be calculated using Kepler's 3rd Law, but adjustments are necessary due to the equal mass of the stars. Given the orbital speed of 220 km/s and an orbital period of 14.4 days, the initial calculation yields a mass of 2.54 x 10^32 kg. However, since both stars have equal mass, the final mass of each star is determined to be 1.26 x 10^32 kg, necessitating a division by two in the final result. The appropriate radius for the calculation must also consider the system's dynamics, differing from single star systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's 3rd Law
  • Familiarity with centripetal force and gravitational pull
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., km/s to m/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kepler's 3rd Law in binary star systems
  • Learn about centripetal force and its relation to gravitational forces
  • Explore methods for calculating the mass of celestial bodies using orbital parameters
  • Investigate the dynamics of binary star systems and their orbital characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of binary star systems and celestial mechanics.

Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Plaskett’s binary system consists of two stars that revolve
in a circular orbit about a center of mass midway between
them. This statement implies that the masses of the two
stars are equal. Assume the orbital speed
of each star is 220 km/s and the orbital period
of each is 14.4 days. Find the mass M of each star.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Kelper's 3rd Law

Mass of the planet = (4(pi)^2(r)^3)/GT^2

T = 1244160
r = 8.72 x 10^10
G = 6.672 x 10^-11

Mass = 2.54 x 10^32, but the answer is 1.26 x 10^32 which is exactly half of my answer

why should I further divide my answer by 2? Is it because there are two planets in the system? But if I use the same equation to calculate the Sun's mass, I just need to substitute all those unknown into the equation without the need to consider the mass of the Earth. So what's wrong?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kepler's third law was originally in the context of planets orbiting the sun. In that context, the sun is so massive compared with the planets that the orbital radius is effectively the distance from the sun's centre. That won't be the case with two equal mass stars, so I'm not sure what the appropriate r is here. Also, how did you obtain r?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib
haruspex said:
Kepler's third law was originally in the context of planets orbiting the sun. In that context, the sun is so massive compared with the planets that the orbital radius is effectively the distance from the sun's centre. That won't be the case with two equal mass stars, so I'm not sure what the appropriate r is here. Also, how did you obtain r?

orbital speed of each star = 220 km/s
orbital period of each = 14.4 days.
Distance Traveled in one period = (220000)(14.4 x 24 x 60 x 60)m. Then, you can get the radius from 2(pi)r

I have solved the problem by using centripetal force= gravitational pull. So probably using Kepler's third law is wrong for binary system.

Thanks anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K