Binding energy, Coulomb energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the binding energy difference between the mirror nuclides ##^{15}O## and ##^{15}N##, and the subsequent determination of their radii based on Coulomb energy differences. The calculated binding energy difference is ##\Delta B = 3.536 MeV##, while the expected value is ##3.532 MeV##. The mean nuclear radius is derived using the formula ##R = R_0A^{1/3}##, with a typical value for ##R_0## cited as approximately ##1.2 fm##, although discrepancies in ##R_0## values were noted in the discussion. The confusion arises from different formulations of the Coulomb energy term, specifically the use of ##Z(Z-1)## versus ##Z^2## in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, specifically binding energy and Coulomb energy.
  • Familiarity with the semi-empirical mass formula for binding energy.
  • Knowledge of the mean nuclear radius formula, ##R = R_0A^{1/3}##.
  • Proficiency in unit conversions, particularly between atomic mass units (u) and MeV.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the semi-empirical mass formula for binding energy and its coefficients.
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum mechanical approaches to calculating Coulomb energy.
  • Explore the implications of varying ##R_0## values across different nuclides.
  • Learn about the significance of the ##Z(Z-1)## term in Coulomb energy calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, particularly those studying nuclear binding energy, Coulomb interactions, and the properties of mirror nuclides.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


a) Calculate the difference in binding energy between the mirror nuclide ##^{15}O## and ##^{15}N##.
b) Calculate the radius of both nuclide’s assuming the difference in binding energy exclusively depends on difference in Coulomb energy.

Homework Equations


Mean nuclear radius
##R = R_0A^{1/3}##.
Binding energy
##B = \left[ Zm(^1H)+Nm_n-m(^AX)\right]c^2##.
Binding energy due to Coulomb repulsion between protons
##E_c = -\frac{3}{5}\frac{e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R_0} Z(Z-1)A^{-1/3}##.
Constants:
##m(^1H) = 1.007825u##
##m_n = 1.00866501u##
##m(^{15}O) = 15.003065u##
##m(^{15}N)=15.000109u##
##1 u = 931.502MeV/c^2##
##\frac{e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0} = 1.439976MeV \cdot fm##.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I solved part a) but I'm having trouble with part b).
The difference in binding energy should be
##\Delta B = \left[ m_n-m(^1H)+m(^{15}O)-m(^{15}N\right] = (0.00379601u)/c^2 = 3.536MeV##. (The answer says ##3.532## but I guess I worked with more decimals)

The difference in Coulomb energy should be (since ##8\cdot 7 - 7\cdot 6 = 14##)
##\Delta B= 3/5 \frac{e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0R_0} 14A^{-1/3}##
##R = R_0A^{1/3} = \frac{3\cdot 14 \cdot 1.439976}{5\cdot 3.536}fm = 3.420752fm##
The answer however says ##R = 3.67fm## so I did something wrong (using 3.532 instead doesn't change anything)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
check the calculation .
what value of R0 was taken? As i find people taking different values!
 
drvrm said:
check the calculation .
what value of R0 was taken? As i find people taking different values!
As I understand the question I should compute ##R_0## from knowing the binding energy (actually ##R_0A^{(1/3)}##).

The typical value for ##R_0## I've seen is ##R_0 \approx 1.2fm## but from my calculation I have a value of ##R_0 =1.38## (and from the answer I would need an even larger ##R_0##. So perhaps I'm doing something wrong as I understand it ##R_0## should be about the same for a nuclide. I'm not entirely sure I'm using the right formulas either, they were simply the ones that seemed to apply to the question.
 
For a nucleus with A nucleons, including Z protons and N neutrons, a semi-empirical formula for the binding energy (BE) per nucleon is:

ba781d47f57680bfa05cecae128018b0.png

where the coefficients are given by:
6e636a65e044a711bcf2291147e23e47.png
;
ee7848ef02b293553a87dfd086501f3c.png
;
29bb3ddcf2ffcb39e1a79007bb680ffa.png
;
7d4b87252fac76a7c6d5772afe4dfccc.png
;
b32d251d4b0da090a11bfa7ceeb212f2.png
. one can have an estimate by third term of the mass formula - just to check (ref.wiki)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucle...iempirical_formula_for_nuclear_binding_energy
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Essentially I'm using the coulomb term out of the that formula. However the version I have is different from the one on wikipedia. My book says
##B = a_vA -a_sA^{(2/3)}-a_cZ(Z-1)A^{(-1/3)}-a_{\text{sym}}\frac{(A-2Z)^2}{A}+\delta.##
Note the difference in the Coulomb term.
If I use ##Z^2## I indeed get the correct result just correcting my earlier value with ##3.42\cdot \frac{15}{14} = 3.67## (since ##8^2-7^2=15##).
Now I'm confused why there's ##Z(Z-1)## in the version In my book. The book argue that the term is proportional to ##Z(Z-1)## since each proton repels each of the other ones.
 
Nucleus Ro (in fermis)

B11 1.28

C13 1.34

N15 1.31

O17 1.26

F19 1.26

Ne21 1.25

Na23 1.22

Mg23 1.23

Al27 1.20

ref.
http://www.bhojvirtualuniversity.com/ss/sim/physics/msc_f_phy_p3u1.doc
The energy discrepancy is because of the use of classical principles instead of quantum mechanical principles in calculating the coulomb energy Ec..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Incand said:
Note the difference in the Coulomb term.
If I use Z2Z2Z^2 I indeed get the correct result just correcting my earlier value with

The difference from wiki is that Wiki Formula is for B/A -binding energy per nucleon - but meanwhile i think its R0 value which changes with nucleids may be responsible for the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Incand said:
Now I'm confused why there's Z(Z−1)Z(Z−1)Z(Z-1) in the version In my book. The book argue that the term is proportional to Z(Z−1)Z(Z−1)Z(Z-1) since each proton repels each of the other ones.

actually its Z(Z-1) but approximated to Z^2 so when you use the former you are very correct. the culprit seems to be R0 value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Thanks for all the help! I believe the answer was calculated using the ##Z^2## approximation so that should explain everything. As for the ##R_0## value I'm not entirely sure. I don't use the actual value of ##R_0## in my calculations although I could compute it.
I'm guessing the difference in ##R_0##(if I compute it) may be because the question only cares about the Coulomb term which isn't the entire truth.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K