Binding energy / mass deficit of Earth-moon system?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational potential energy and mass deficit of the Earth-moon system, specifically focusing on the implications of the moon's motion and the calculation of binding energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of gravitational potential energy and mass deficit, with one participant expressing concern about the magnitude of the mass deficit. Questions arise regarding the treatment of the moon's kinetic energy and whether it should be included in the binding energy calculation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and calculations related to binding energy. Some participants suggest reconsidering the inclusion of kinetic energy in the calculations, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the assumptions made in the calculations, particularly the decision to ignore the moon's kinetic energy in the context of binding energy.

EternusVia
Messages
92
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Consider the earth-moon system (whose constituent pats we take to be the Earth and the moon separately).

a) Compute this system's gravitational potential energy (in joules) and the mass deficit (in kilograms). The radius of the moon's orbit is 384,000 km, and its period is 27.3 days. Does it matter that the moon is moving?

(Taken from Six Ideas that Shaped Physics, Unit Q, Chapter 13, Problem Q13M.9)

Homework Equations


Gravitational potential energy
U(r) = \frac{-GM_eM_m}{r}
Binding energy
E_b = E_{parts} - E_{sys}
Mass deficit
\Delta m = \frac{E_b}{c^2}
Conversion factor
1\frac{J}{c^2} \approx 1.1128 * 10^-17 \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{ kg}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My answers are shown below. Barring any computational mistakes, my question is about interpreting the results. I find that the mass deficit is many many millions of kilograms! That's HUGE! It seems unreasonably huge. Did I do something wrong?

a)
The moon's movement keeps it from simply falling into the earth, but it doesn't affect the potential energy, so it doesn't affect the mass deficit.
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> U(r) &amp;= \frac{-GM_eM_m}{r} \\<br /> &amp;= -\frac{\left(6.67 \times 10^{-11} \frac{\mathrm{N \cdot m^2}}{\mathrm{kg^2}}\right) \left(5.98 \times 10^{24} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}\right) \left(7.36 \times 10^{22} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}\right)}{384,000 \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{km}} \\<br /> &amp;= -7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{N \cdot m} \\<br /> &amp;= -7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

This implies that
$$E_b = 0 - U(r) = 7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}.$$

And by the conversion factor,
$$\Delta m = \frac{E_b}{c^2} = \frac{7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}}{c^2} \cdot \frac{1.1128 \times 10^{-17} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}}{\frac{\mathrm{J}}{c^2}} = 8.51 \times 10^{11} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} $$

b) $$\frac{\Delta m}{m_{\mathrm{moon}}} = \frac{\left(8.51 \times 10^{11} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} \right)}{\left(7.36 \times 10^{22} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} \right)} = 1.156 \times 10^{-11}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As your last line of calculation shows, your answer is actually very small compared to the mass of the moon and even much smaller compared to the total mass of the Earth and moon as a system.

However, are you sure that you should ignore the energy due to the motion of the moon?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EternusVia
TSny said:
As your last line of calculation shows, your answer is actually very small compared to the mass of the moon and even much smaller compared to the total mass of the Earth and moon as a system.

However, are you sure that you should ignore the energy due to the motion of the moon?

I reviewed the definition of binding energy. Effectively, binding energy is the energy you need to put into separate the objects of the system infinitely and at rest. Sense they have to be at rest, I should have calculated the kinetic energy of the moon and added it to the potential energy, correct?
 
EternusVia said:
I reviewed the definition of binding energy. Effectively, binding energy is the energy you need to put into separate the objects of the system infinitely and at rest. Sense they have to be at rest, I should have calculated the kinetic energy of the moon and added it to the potential energy, correct?
Yes. What matters is the difference between the total energy of the system in the bound state and the total energy of the system when the Earth and moon are infinitely far apart and at rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EternusVia

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K