Binding energy / mass deficit of Earth-moon system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational potential energy and mass deficit of the Earth-moon system, utilizing the equations for gravitational potential energy (U) and binding energy (E_b). The gravitational potential energy was computed as U(r) = -7.645 × 1028 J, leading to a mass deficit of Δm = 8.51 × 1011 kg. It was concluded that while the mass deficit appears large, it is negligible compared to the total mass of the moon and the Earth-moon system. The kinetic energy of the moon must also be considered for accurate binding energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy equations
  • Familiarity with binding energy concepts
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2)
  • Basic principles of orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy calculations in multi-body systems
  • Study the kinetic energy of celestial bodies in orbit
  • Explore the implications of mass deficit in astrophysics
  • Investigate the concept of binding energy in different physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in celestial mechanics and energy calculations in gravitational systems.

EternusVia
Messages
92
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Consider the earth-moon system (whose constituent pats we take to be the Earth and the moon separately).

a) Compute this system's gravitational potential energy (in joules) and the mass deficit (in kilograms). The radius of the moon's orbit is 384,000 km, and its period is 27.3 days. Does it matter that the moon is moving?

(Taken from Six Ideas that Shaped Physics, Unit Q, Chapter 13, Problem Q13M.9)

Homework Equations


Gravitational potential energy
U(r) = \frac{-GM_eM_m}{r}
Binding energy
E_b = E_{parts} - E_{sys}
Mass deficit
\Delta m = \frac{E_b}{c^2}
Conversion factor
1\frac{J}{c^2} \approx 1.1128 * 10^-17 \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{ kg}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My answers are shown below. Barring any computational mistakes, my question is about interpreting the results. I find that the mass deficit is many many millions of kilograms! That's HUGE! It seems unreasonably huge. Did I do something wrong?

a)
The moon's movement keeps it from simply falling into the earth, but it doesn't affect the potential energy, so it doesn't affect the mass deficit.
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> U(r) &amp;= \frac{-GM_eM_m}{r} \\<br /> &amp;= -\frac{\left(6.67 \times 10^{-11} \frac{\mathrm{N \cdot m^2}}{\mathrm{kg^2}}\right) \left(5.98 \times 10^{24} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}\right) \left(7.36 \times 10^{22} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}\right)}{384,000 \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{km}} \\<br /> &amp;= -7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{N \cdot m} \\<br /> &amp;= -7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

This implies that
$$E_b = 0 - U(r) = 7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}.$$

And by the conversion factor,
$$\Delta m = \frac{E_b}{c^2} = \frac{7.645 \times 10^{28} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{J}}{c^2} \cdot \frac{1.1128 \times 10^{-17} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg}}{\frac{\mathrm{J}}{c^2}} = 8.51 \times 10^{11} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} $$

b) $$\frac{\Delta m}{m_{\mathrm{moon}}} = \frac{\left(8.51 \times 10^{11} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} \right)}{\left(7.36 \times 10^{22} \hspace{1mm} \mathrm{kg} \right)} = 1.156 \times 10^{-11}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As your last line of calculation shows, your answer is actually very small compared to the mass of the moon and even much smaller compared to the total mass of the Earth and moon as a system.

However, are you sure that you should ignore the energy due to the motion of the moon?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EternusVia
TSny said:
As your last line of calculation shows, your answer is actually very small compared to the mass of the moon and even much smaller compared to the total mass of the Earth and moon as a system.

However, are you sure that you should ignore the energy due to the motion of the moon?

I reviewed the definition of binding energy. Effectively, binding energy is the energy you need to put into separate the objects of the system infinitely and at rest. Sense they have to be at rest, I should have calculated the kinetic energy of the moon and added it to the potential energy, correct?
 
EternusVia said:
I reviewed the definition of binding energy. Effectively, binding energy is the energy you need to put into separate the objects of the system infinitely and at rest. Sense they have to be at rest, I should have calculated the kinetic energy of the moon and added it to the potential energy, correct?
Yes. What matters is the difference between the total energy of the system in the bound state and the total energy of the system when the Earth and moon are infinitely far apart and at rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EternusVia

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K