New unit of mass in a different system of units....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of mass units within a different system of units, specifically exploring the implications of setting constants like the speed of light (c) and the gravitational constant (G) to unity. Participants are examining how these conversions affect dimensional analysis and the interpretation of physical quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to manipulate equations involving c and G to explore unit conversions. Questions arise regarding the dimensionality of these constants when expressed in a natural unit system, and whether the formulation of the problem affects the interpretation of these units.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using natural units, with some participants suggesting methods for converting units and questioning the dimensionality of the results. The discussion is productive, with various interpretations being considered, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of unit conversion and dimensional analysis, with some noting the challenge of interpreting mass, time, and speed in a system where these quantities may become dimensionless. The original poster expresses uncertainty about isolating mass and the implications of the chosen unit system.

etotheipi
Homework Statement
In this new system of units, the unit length is still 1 m, however the units of time and mass are chosen such that c and G are both of magnitude unity. What's the new unit of mass, in kg?
Relevant Equations
N/A
I'm finding it slightly tricky to just get a hold of where to start. I try $$\text{m}\text{s}^{-1} = \frac{c}{3\times 10^8}$$ If we then set ##c = 1##, that would seem to imply $$3\times 10^8 = \text{s}\text{m}^{-1}$$For ##G = 1##, I might also write $$\text{kg}\text{m}^{-3}\text{s}^{2} = 6.67\times 10^{-11}$$From here I'm slightly lost. I wondered whether I should try to isolate ##\text{kg}## somehow, like $$\text{s}^{2} = 9 \times 10^{16} \text{m}^{2} \implies 1 \text{kg} = 7.41 \times 10^{-28} \text{m}$$But this doesn't seem to help me much. I wondered whether someone could give me a little pointer in the right direction? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could imagine converting units for ##G## from ##m, s, kg## to ##m, T_e, M_e##, say.

If you want ##G = 1 \ m^3 T_e^{-2} M_e^{-1}##, then that shoud give you the conversion from ##kg## to ##M_e## units.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
##T_e = 3.34 \times 10^{-9}s, \ \ M_e = 1.35 \times 10^{27}kg##
 
PeroK said:
You could imagine converting units for ##G## from ##m, s, kg## to ##m, T_e, M_e##, say.

If you want ##G = 1 \ m^3 T_e^{-2} M_e^{-1}##, then that shoud give you the conversion from ##kg## to ##M_e## units.

So then $$G = 1m^3T_e^{-2}M_e^{-1} = 6.67 \times 10^{-11} m^{3} s^{-2} kg^{-1}$$ $$c = 1m T_e^{-1} = 3 \times 10^{8} m s^{-1}$$ After a bit of cancellation: $$T_e = 3.33 \times 10^{-9} s$$ $$M_e = 1.35 \times 10^{27} kg$$

I think I understand this method, but I thought that when we use some form of natural units we set the relevant quantities (in this case, ##c## and ##G##) to be dimensionless, like ##c=1##. However, in this method the quantities still have dimensions. I wonder if this is just because of how the question is formulated - i.e. it's not exactly a natural unit system in this case?
 
PeroK said:
##T_e = 3.34 \times 10^{-9}s, \ \ M_e = 1.35 \times 10^{27}kg##

Pipped to the post :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
etotheipi said:
However, in this method the quantities still have dimensions. I wonder if this is just because of how the question is formulated - i.e. it's not exactly a natural unit system in this case?
To consider dimensionless quantities is something further.

You can now measure time in metres and a speed becomes a dimensionless quantity. And, you can measure mass in metres. Your ##1.35 \times10^{27} kg## becomes ##1m## and that is, physically, half the Schwarzschild radius of something of that mass. And your gravitational constant becomes dimensionless if you measure mass, length and time all in metres.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
PeroK said:
To consider dimensionless quantities is something further.

You can now measure time in metres and a speed becomes a dimensionless quantity. And, you can measure mass in metres. Your ##1.35 \times10^{27} kg## becomes ##1m##

Ah OK sure. So the next time someone asks me how tall I am, I'll just give it in kilograms...

PeroK said:
and that is, physically, half the Schwarzschild radius of something of that mass.

That's quite a nice touch!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K