Biogas or solar heat storage cooker for rural villages?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the viability of biogas generators versus solar heat storage cookers for rural villages in Africa and Asia that currently rely on traditional biomass fuels. Biogas systems can utilize waste materials, including human waste, to generate methane for cooking, potentially addressing sanitation issues. In contrast, solar cookers using molten salt can store energy for later use, but their effectiveness depends on local solar conditions. Additionally, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding local customs, resources, and cooking needs to design effective solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of biogas generation and its applications
  • Knowledge of solar thermal energy storage systems
  • Familiarity with traditional cooking practices in rural settings
  • Awareness of local resource availability and sanitation issues
NEXT STEPS
  • Research biogas generator designs suitable for rural applications
  • Explore solar thermal energy storage technologies and their efficiency
  • Investigate traditional cooking methods and their energy requirements
  • Study case examples of successful implementations of solar lights and stoves in similar contexts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for renewable energy engineers, humanitarian aid workers, and policymakers focused on sustainable cooking solutions in rural communities.

RaGun
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

For villages in Africa and Asia that still use wood, dung or other biomass in simple stoves which option do you think will be better?

Concentrate solar energy into an insulated unit with a molten salt which can then be used at any time or build a simple biogas generator (large scale or maybe even household) using rubbish, biomass, dung and maybe even human waste. With the second option you could also maybe help with the sanitation problem.

There is also a third option of using much more efficient stoves so the current fuel they use will last longer and produce less smoke and particulates.

Are there any other alternatives or ideas? Been thinking about this over the last few days and wanted some expert opinions. What would you do?

Thanks for reading.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is not possible to design a good solution without extensive knowledge of the people, their customs and beliefs, their available resources (sun, digestible biomass, burnable biomass), economic payback, and available financing. You also need to match resources and needs. For example, how does the amount of methane from a human waste digester compare to the family's cooking needs?

An example of a successful product is solar lights in poor areas without electric grid. Compared to kerosene lamps, solar is better light, much cheaper to own, and cleaner: https://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/12/solar-lights-eradicating-kerosene-lamps-africa/

Check out Engineers Without Borders: https://www.ewb-usa.org/.
 
RaGun said:
Are there any other alternatives or ideas?

I think there are very many attempts to do exactly what you propose. Your first step should be to research those earlier attempts. I suspect that just about every imaginable scheme has been considered.
 
Check how much cloud cover they have, also what times of day they do traditional cooking, and how.
{ For silly example, compare temperature & time requirements for 'stir fry' & 'stew'... }
Will they be able to prepare enough traditional meals in a sufficiently traditional way at traditional times ?

Also, consider maintenance. IIRC, a lot of charities' drilled wells became unusable when their tool-kits and spares were sold, traded or stolen...
 
RaGun said:
There is also a third option of using much more efficient stoves so the current fuel they use will last longer and produce less smoke and particulates
Still wondering what problem is being solved here.

Is it the scarcity of dung and combustibles?
Is it the time collecting dung and other combustibles?
Which might imply a of foraging far from the village and entering into subsequent dangerous situations.
Perhaps, since smoke and particulate matter is mentioned, the health and well being of the cook is being contemplated.
Some solutions are not time savers nor effort savers nor cheap nor failsafe ( in regards to always being able to cook the food that day if the tech breaks down ).

What do the villagers say?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K