Biomechanics Biceps Problem - Classical Mechanics (Moment Arms/Forces)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a biomechanics problem involving the biceps brachii muscle and its role in balancing forces in the arm. The scenario includes calculating forces exerted by the biceps to hold the forearm parallel to the ground while considering the weight of the forearm and the forces at the elbow joint.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, including the assumptions about the alignment of points and the angles of insertion for the biceps. There are attempts to calculate moment arms and forces using trigonometric relationships, with some participants questioning the validity of their assumptions and calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations and results, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made regarding the geometry of the arm and the implications of their results. There is an ongoing exploration of the effects of these assumptions on the calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the approaches taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants note uncertainties regarding the height differential between points of muscle attachment and the elbow joint, as well as the relevance of the forearm's width in their calculations. The discussion reflects a learning process where assumptions are being critically examined.

sKyHigh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Please let me know if I did this wrong or right, and if I did it wrong, please correct me :)

1. Homework Statement

The biceps brachii, a muscle in the arm, connects the radius, a bone in the forearm, to the scapula in the shoulder (see below). The muscle attaches at two places on the scapula but at only one on the radius. To move or hold the arm in place, the biceps muscle balances the weight of the arm and the force at the elbow joint. The centre of mass of the arm is at 15 cm from the elbow joint. The horizontal force of the elbow joint is 6.5 N when the forearm is held parallel to the ground and the forearm weighs 15.3 N. If the biceps supports the entire weight of the forearm, calculate the necessary force from each branch of the biceps to hold the forearm parallel to the ground and the vertical force at the elbow.

biceps brachii[2].png


2. Homework Equations

net F = 0; net Fx = 0, net Fy = 0
net torque = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Choose E as point of rotation (i.e., Moment Arm of E, MAE = 0)

MAarm = (15.3 N)(15 cm) = 229.5 N cm

Determine angles of insertions of A and B:

Firstly, I assume that, based on the diagram, points E and B (the point where B attaches to the scapula) line up vertically - is this assumption valid?

Thus angle of insertion of A = thetaA = tan-1(30/2) = 86.19 deg
Similarly, thetaB = tan-1(30/5) = 80.54 deg

Torque balance:

MAarm = MAA + MAB
229.5 N cm = FA * (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) + FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)

Rearranging for FA,
FA = [229.5 N cm - FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)] / (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) ... Eq. 1

Note: The "(5 cm)sin(86.19 deg)" and "(5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)" represent, respectively, the lengths of the lines that originate at E and intersect the FA and FB vectors such that the lines form right angles with said vectors.

Force balance:

x-direction:
FEx = FAx + FBx
6.5 N = FAcos(86.19 deg) + FBcos(80.54 deg)
FA = [6.5 N - FBcos(80.54 deg)] / cos(86.19 deg) ... Eq. 2

Substituting Eq. 1 into Eq. 2 yields:

[229.5 N cm - FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)] / (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) = [6.5 N - FBcos(80.54 deg)] / cos(86.19 deg)
46 N - 0.989FB = 97.82 N - 2.473FB
1.484FB = 51.82 N
FB = 34.92 N

Substituting this result into either of Eqs. 1 or 2 yields FA = 11.47 N

y-dir'n force balance:
15.3 N = FAy + FBy + FEy
FEy = 15.3 N - (11.47 N)sin(86.19 deg) - (34.92 N)sin(80.54 deg)
FEy = -30.6 N - am I supposed to get a negative answer here?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buuuuump! xD
 
It's a fun problem for anyone who enjoys classical mechanics. Can anyone afford the time to work through the problem and see if they get the same numbers as me? Thanks!
 
sKyHigh said:
Please let me know if I did this wrong or right, and if I did it wrong, please correct me :)

1. Homework Statement

The biceps brachii, a muscle in the arm, connects the radius, a bone in the forearm, to the scapula in the shoulder (see below). The muscle attaches at two places on the scapula but at only one on the radius. To move or hold the arm in place, the biceps muscle balances the weight of the arm and the force at the elbow joint. The centre of mass of the arm is at 15 cm from the elbow joint. The horizontal force of the elbow joint is 6.5 N when the forearm is held parallel to the ground and the forearm weighs 15.3 N. If the biceps supports the entire weight of the forearm, calculate the necessary force from each branch of the biceps to hold the forearm parallel to the ground and the vertical force at the elbow.

View attachment 73651

2. Homework Equations

net F = 0; net Fx = 0, net Fy = 0
net torque = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Choose E as point of rotation (i.e., Moment Arm of E, MAE = 0)

MAarm = (15.3 N)(15 cm) = 229.5 N cm

Determine angles of insertions of A and B:

Firstly, I assume that, based on the diagram, points E and B (the point where B attaches to the scapula) line up vertically - is this assumption valid?

Thus angle of insertion of A = thetaA = tan-1(30/2) = 86.19 deg
Similarly, thetaB = tan-1(30/5) = 80.54 deg

Torque balance:

MAarm = MAA + MAB
229.5 N cm = FA * (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) + FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)

Rearranging for FA,
FA = [229.5 N cm - FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)] / (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) ... Eq. 1

Note: The "(5 cm)sin(86.19 deg)" and "(5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)" represent, respectively, the lengths of the lines that originate at E and intersect the FA and FB vectors such that the lines form right angles with said vectors.

Force balance:

x-direction:
FEx = FAx + FBx
6.5 N = FAcos(86.19 deg) + FBcos(80.54 deg)
FA = [6.5 N - FBcos(80.54 deg)] / cos(86.19 deg) ... Eq. 2

Substituting Eq. 1 into Eq. 2 yields:

[229.5 N cm - FB * (5 cm)sin(80.54 deg)] / (5 cm)sin(86.19 deg) = [6.5 N - FBcos(80.54 deg)] / cos(86.19 deg)
46 N - 0.989FB = 97.82 N - 2.473FB
1.484FB = 51.82 N
FB = 34.92 N

Substituting this result into either of Eqs. 1 or 2 yields FA = 11.47 N

y-dir'n force balance:
15.3 N = FAy + FBy + FEy
FEy = 15.3 N - (11.47 N)sin(86.19 deg) - (34.92 N)sin(80.54 deg)
FEy = -30.6 N - am I supposed to get a negative answer here?!
That all looks right. To see whether the vertical force should be up or down, consider moments about the point where the muscle attaches to the radius.
 
haruspex said:
That all looks right. To see whether the vertical force should be up or down, consider moments about the point where the muscle attaches to the radius.
Thanks for responding! Was my use of trigonometry correct, particularly when calculating the moment arms? I neglected the 6 cm width of the forearm, not sure if it was okay to do so. That's where I had a bit of uncertainty. Also, in retrospect, FEy should be negative; the elbow ALWAYS exerts a net downward force in this configuration.
 
sKyHigh said:
Thanks for responding! Was my use of trigonometry correct, particularly when calculating the moment arms? I neglected the 6 cm width of the forearm, not sure if it was okay to do so. That's where I had a bit of uncertainty. Also, in retrospect, FEy should be negative; the elbow ALWAYS exerts a net downward force in this configuration.
The 6cm width is not in itself relevant, but your working is not quite accurate because the point of attachment of the muscle to the radius is slightly above the joint. The height difference is unclear - it looks to be less than 3cm.
 
haruspex said:
The 6cm width is not in itself relevant, but your working is not quite accurate because the point of attachment of the muscle to the radius is slightly above the joint. The height difference is unclear - it looks to be less than 3cm.
Thank you, that is precisely where my uncertainty lies in my attempt to solve the problem. Do you know of a more accurate way to solve the problem than assuming a height differential of, say, 2.5 cm? That is, I would instead use "(5.6 cm)sin(86.19 deg)" and "(5.6 cm)sin(80.54 deg)", respectively, when calculating MAA and MAB, where the "5.6 cm" is obtained via

c2 = a2 + b2
c2 = 52 + 2.52
c = 5.6 cm

The other uncertainty is the assumption that points B and E are in vertical alignment. What do you think of this assumption? Is it necessary to solve the problem? Valid?

Many thanks for helping me out!
 
Last edited:
Bump! :p
 
By assuming a height differential of 2.5 cm between E and the point of insertion of the biceps into the radius (i.e., a distance of 5.6 cm between E and said point of insertion), I get FA = 3.26 N, FB = 38.24 N, and FEy = 25.67 N [down]. Can anyone verify this? Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K