Bismuth Crystals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 823 views
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
4,116
Reaction score
3,275
Very unusual looking.

 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
Very unusual looking.



Yeah, often found at mineral shows, they are lab grown, they dont normally grow like that in the ground
I have a couple of pieces like that here in my collection, if I remember, I will do a photo
 
Last edited:
davenn said:
Yeah, often found at mineral shows, they are lab grown, they dont normally grow like that in the ground
I have a couple of peices like that here in my collection, if I remember, I will do a photo
It has both metallic and crystalline forms. Does anything else or is this unique?
 
Last edited:
Hornbein said:
It has both metallic and crystalline forms. Does anything else or is this unique?

Metallic and crystalline are not mutually exclusive :wink:
Almost all metals have crystalline forms

Dave
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost
davenn said:
Metallic and crystalline are not mutually exclusive :wink:
Almost all metals have crystalline forms

Dave
Aha. So it's the size of the crystals then. Do any metals aside from Bismuth so easily form large crystals like that.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Huh, I thought metals had to be made of the elements, not compounds. I thought metals had to be flexible. The dictionaries say otherwise. They say the only requirements are that it be hard and conduct electricity and heat. There's no arguing with dictionaries, but in this case I believe they deviate from actual usage. If I were to use the word in this way I would be misunderstood.

I also learned that a "metalled road" is a road covered with crushed stone.
 
Hornbein said:
Huh, I thought metals had to be made of the elements, not compounds. I thought metals had to be flexible. The dictionaries say otherwise. They say the only requirements are that it be hard and conduct electricity and heat. There's no arguing with dictionaries, but in this case I believe they deviate from actual usage. If I were to use the word in this way I would be misunderstood.

I also learned that a "metalled road" is a road covered with crushed stone.
I always thought that steel, bronze, and brass were metals. But that's the problem with vernacular language, it all depends on how you learned it. IDK.

But "flexible"? OK, whatever.
 
DaveE said:
I always thought that steel, bronze, and brass were metals. But that's the problem with vernacular language, it all depends on how you learned it. IDK.

But "flexible"? OK, whatever.
Steel bronze and brass are alloys entirely composed of the elements (or so I believe anyway). No rule against mixing them.
 
Hornbein said:
entirely composed of the elements
Perhaps you misspoke? Isn't that everything?
Also, I don't think the Carbon in Steel is a metal, but I'm bad at Chemistry and Carbon is weird.
Anyway my point is that common language fails in science when we start splitting hairs.

Anyway Gallium might be a good candidate. Like Bismuth it isn't toxic or very reactive, and has a low melting point.
 
DaveE said:
Perhaps you misspoke? Isn't that everything?
Also, I don't think the Carbon in Steel is a metal, but I'm bad at Chemistry and Carbon is weird.
Anyway my point is that common language fails in science when we start splitting hairs.

Anyway Gallium might be a good candidate. Like Bismuth it isn't toxic or very reactive, and has a low melting point.


If I had written "composed entirely of an element" then I would have misspoken.

Carbon is an element so I say it's included. It's not a metal but that doesn't prevent it from being included in a metal.

I am puzzled by why the dictionary definition differs so much from common usage. Maybe chemists use that definition. But dictionaries make note of specialized usages.
 
Hornbein said:
Aha. So it's the size of the crystals then. Do any metals aside from Bismuth so easily form large crystals like that.

no, crystal size is irrelevent.
a crystal is a crystal regardless of it is 1mm or 1m in size
and it also doesnt matter if it is a metal or a non-metal element
 
Hornbein said:
It has both metallic and crystalline forms. Does anything else or is this unique?
DaveE said:
This has become a very strange thread. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something.

Hi Dave ... it's all because Hornbein didnt seem to realise that most metals have crystal forms
as I stated earlier. He appeared to think that the crystal habit of a metal was uncommon and that
a metallic substance ( pure element or mineral compound) couldnt be both a metal and a crystal.

The confusion comes with not realising that a crystal is just a form/habit of elements or minerals

Galena, PbS - Lead Sulphide - has a cubic crystal habit
1784189709840.webp


But Fluorite - CaF2 - totally non-metallic, also has a Cubic crystal habit
1784189995534.webp


Neither of those 2 are from my collection .... this next one is


Pyrite - FeS2 -Iron Sulphide - from my collection, also has a Cubic crystal habit
1784190158002.webp



With only a quick look, Bismuth is the only native element that I found with a cubic crystal habit,
there may be other ones?

But there are many different crystal habits for all native elements and for minerals

A mineral, is just a combination of native elements as shown in the examples above

cheers
Dave
 
It appears one may grow large crystals of any of the metallic elements. This seldom occurs in nature and I suppose it isn't easy dealing with the necessary high temperatures. Iron crystals may sometimes be found in meteorites.

Sure enough, it's easy to make big gallium crystals.

I liked the theory that the celebrated 'Oumuamua asteroid is an intergalactic crystal of hydrogen. But such would not have survived solar radiation.