Black body re-emission of incident radiation

Julianotcp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know that a black body is an idealized body that absorbs all the incident EM radiation. And I also know that the BB emits a spectrum of thermal radiation that depends on its temperature.

What I cannot understand is the re-emission. For what I've read, when in thermal equilibrium, a BB absorbs and re-emits continuously all the incident radiation. Is that right?

So, when in thermal equilibrium, if a black body absorbs visible light, then why doesn't it re-emit visible light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But it does emit visible light. Every hot glowing body does.
 
Yes, but my doubt is for the light that it absorbs. Say that a BB is in thermal equilibrium at room temperature, and there is white light inciding on it. Why doesn't the BB re-emits this white light? Where does it go? Does it raise the temperature of the BB?

Obs.: Sorry for my bad english :)
 
Yes, the white light is absorbed. But, as the BB has a lower temperature as the white light source, the white light will be absorbed and eventually rise the temperature of the BB. However, the BB will only emit the spectrum corresponding to it's temperature, which has it's maximum in the far infrared. Absorption and emission are two completely independent processes in a BB.
 
Ok, now I understand. Thank you :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top