Black Holes & Light: Can Gravitational Force Exceed Speed of Light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravitational force in relation to black holes and the speed of light. Participants explore whether the gravitational force of a black hole can exceed the speed of light, particularly in the context of light being unable to escape a black hole's gravitational pull. The conversation includes conceptual clarifications and speculative reasoning about gravitational fields and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if the inability of light to escape a black hole implies that gravitational force can exceed the speed of light.
  • One participant asserts that force and speed are different quantities, suggesting that gravity does not have a specific speed.
  • Another participant elaborates on the concept of gravitational force as being embodied in a gravitational field that exists around a black hole, which guides light back into the hole without needing to "catch up" to it.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of gravitational fields, including the idea that changes in the field propagate at the speed of light, but for a steady black hole, the field itself does not have a speed.
  • A later reply introduces a speculative idea about areas of spacetime that may never be "disturbed" and questions the properties of such localities, including the concept of zero inertia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravitational force and the speed of light, with no consensus reached on the implications of black holes on this relationship.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gravitational fields and their interaction with light, which remain unresolved. The implications of gravitational propagation and its effects on spacetime are also not fully explored.

Liger20
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Black holes exert such a powerful gravitational force that even light cannot escape its grip. But doesn't this imply that the rule about how nothing can exceed the speed of light has been violated? If a black hole can suck in light, then doesn't that mean that the gravitational force of a black hole can exceed the speed of light?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Liger20 said:
Black holes exert such a powerful gravitational force that even light cannot escape its grip. But doesn't this imply that the rule about how nothing can exceed the speed of light has been violated? If a black hole can suck in light, then doesn't that mean that the gravitational force of a black hole can exceed the speed of light?

No - force and speed are different quantities. The force of gravity doesn't have any particular speed.
 
Liger20 said:
Black holes exert such a powerful gravitational force that even light cannot escape its grip. But doesn't this imply that the rule about how nothing can exceed the speed of light has been violated? If a black hole can suck in light, then doesn't that mean that the gravitational force of a black hole can exceed the speed of light?

Mathman gave you a correct answer. However I am interested in what I think is your mental picture. It seems as if you imagine the Force having a speed, as if it consisted of little force particles running after the light particles, trying to catch them! And these force particles have certain speed, limited by the usual speed limit.

If the Force police actually WAITED until a light particle tried to make a run for it, then I think you would be right! The force would never catch up and haul them back!

But actually the force is embodied in the GRAVIATIONAL FIELD that is already out there around the black hole.
You can think of it either as a force field or as a curvature of the GEOMETRY of spacetime, which GUIDES almost every outgoing lightray back into the hole.
With almost no exception, all the geodesics---the straightest lines light can follow in the curved geometry---lead back to the hole.

Or if you don't like geometry, think "force", but it is the same in gravity case. Changes in the field do propagate like waves, it is thought, probably at the speed of light. But for a steady black hole the field is not changing and it doesn't have any speed. THE FIELD IS ALREADY OUT THERE ready to send the light back.
 
Last edited:
Okay, thanks, that makes sense...
 
1 universe.
Billions of galaxies.
Each galaxy contains billions of stars.
Each star has at least one planet orbiting it.
Surely there’s more life out then us, and more intelligent
 
marcus said:
Mathman gave you a correct answer. However I am interested in what I think is your mental picture. It seems as if you imagine the Force having a speed, as if it consisted of little force particles running after the light particles, trying to catch them! And these force particles have certain speed, limited by the usual speed limit.

If the Force police actually WAITED until a light particle tried to make a run for it, then I think you would be right! The force would never catch up and haul them back!

But actually the force is embodied in the GRAVIATIONAL FIELD that is already out there around the black hole.
You can think of it either as a force field or as a curvature of the GEOMETRY of spacetime, which GUIDES almost every outgoing lightray back into the hole.
With almost no exception, all the geodesics---the straightest lines light can follow in the curved geometry---lead back to the hole.

Or if you don't like geometry, think "force", but it is the same in gravity case. Changes in the field do propagate like waves, it is thought, probably at the speed of light. But for a steady black hole the field is not changing and it doesn't have any speed. THE FIELD IS ALREADY OUT THERE ready to send the light back.

If gravity does propagate at c, this would mean that there could be areas of space time that were never "disturbed", wouldn't it? What would be the properties of such localities, zero inertia?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K