Block and cylinder down an incline

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass m1 attached to a uniform solid cylinder of mass m2 and radius R, both accelerating down an incline at an angle θ. The cylinder rolls without slipping while the block slides down the slope, which has a coefficient of kinetic friction μ. The objective is to find an expression for the acceleration of the system, considering the forces acting on both the block and the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss applying Newton's laws to both the block and the cylinder separately, considering forces in both x and y directions. There are questions about the role of tension in the strings and the effect of friction on the cylinder. Some participants also explore the need for torque equations due to the rolling motion of the cylinder.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts at formulating the correct equations. Some have arrived at expressions for acceleration but express uncertainty about their correctness. Others are questioning assumptions about the forces involved, particularly regarding friction and torque.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between static and kinetic friction, as well as the need for multiple equations to solve for the unknowns in the system. There is also mention of a diagram accompanying the problem, which may aid in visualizing the setup.

vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m1 is attached to the axle of a uniform solid cylinder of mass m2 and radius R by massless strings. The two accelerate down a slope that makes an angle [itex]\theta[/itex] with the horizontal. The cylinder rolls without slipping and the block slides with coefficient of kinetic friction [itex]\mu[/itex] between the block and slope. The strings are attached to the cylinders axle with frictionless loops so that the cylinder can roll freely without any torque from the string. Find an expression for the acceleration of the pair, assuming that the string remains taut.


Homework Equations


F=ma
T=tension in string
N=normal force
a=acceleration of system

The Attempt at a Solution


I applied Newton to the block and cylinder separately.
For the block (choosing axis with x direction parallel to the slope and y direction perpendicular to the slope)
y direction:
[tex]N-m_{1}g\cos\theta=0[/tex]
x direction:
[tex]T-\mu N + m_{1}g\sin\theta=m_{1}a[/tex]

For cylinder
x direction:
[tex]-T+m_{2}g\sin\theta = m_{2}a[/tex]

I can solve for the acceleration but its not in agreement with the answer in the book, so perhaps I am leaving something out. Could be the torque on the cylinder but not sure about that.

Anyone got any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did they give a diagram along with the question?
Which moves first? The block or the cylinder?
and if you meant 'strings' then there should be tension from each string acting on the block, right?
 
Last edited:
yeah there was a diagram. the cylinder is closer to the bottom and the block is up the top
 
vladimir69 said:
yeah there was a diagram. the cylinder is closer to the bottom and the block is up the top

Yea, thanks for that info. Let me see. hm
 
There are two strings connecting the objects, right?
 
I got an answer now and would like to know if its correct.
[tex]a = 2 \frac{(m_{1} + m_{2})g sin\theta - \mu m_{1}g cos\theta}{3 m_{2} + 2 m_{1}}[/tex]
 
yeah that looks about right
how did you go about getting that result
 
Write the correct force equations for both the block and the cylinder and also the torque equation for the cylinder since its rolling.
Hint : Friction provides torque for the cylinder to rotate.
 
ahh yes the correct force equations... i am guessing i have them correct.
i am not sure about the torque on the cylinder, perhaps gravity also provides torque to the cylinder?
but something must be wrong because according to my equations i can solve for the acceleration without the need for the torque equation
 
  • #10
Gravity is a central force. It can't quite provide torque for rotation. Only friction does it in this case.
 
  • #11
note: x-axis taken to be parallel to the slope of the incline
Torque equation for cylinder:
[tex]-Rm_{2}g\sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R^2\alpha[/tex]

=>[tex]R=-\frac{2g}{\alpha}\sin\theta[/tex]

Forces for block: y direction
[tex]N_{1}-m_{1}g\cos\theta=0[/tex]

Forces on block: x direction (*)
[tex] T-\mu N + m_{1}g\sin\theta=m_{1}a[/tex]

Forces on cylinder: x direction (*)
[tex] -T+m_{2}g\sin\theta - \mu N_{2} = m_{2}a[/tex]

Forces on cylinder: y direction
[tex]N_{2}-m_{2}g\cos\theta=0[/tex]

The only difference with my first answer is that I added friction to the force equation for the cylinder along the x axis, but i still don't need the torque equation to solve for acceleration. So I think it can be narrowed down to either block or cylinder force equation along the x-axis (marked with asterisks). The only thing I can think of is the accelerations, a, for those equations is different but that doesn't sound right to me as they should both be accelerating at the same rate down the hill.
 
  • #12
Careful: You cannot assume that the friction force on the cylinder equals μN. That friction force is static friction, and it will have whatever value is required to prevent slipping up to a maximum of μN. Hint: Call the friction force on the cylinder F and treat it as one of your unknowns.

You have three unknowns and you'll need three equations.
 
  • #13
note: x-axis taken to be parallel to the slope of the incline
Torque equation for cylinder:
[tex]-RF_{f}=\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R^2\alpha[/tex]
=>
[tex]F_{f} = -\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R\alpha[/tex]

Forces for block: y direction
[tex]N-m_{1}g\cos\theta=0[/tex]

Forces on block: x direction (*)
[tex]T-\mu N + m_{1}g\sin\theta=m_{1}a[/tex]
[tex]T=\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a[/tex]

Forces on cylinder: x direction (*)
[tex]-T+m_{2}g\sin\theta - F_{f} = m_{2}a[/tex]
[tex]T= m_{2}g\sin\theta - F_{f} -m_{2}a[/tex]

popping everything in
[tex]\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a=m_{2}g\sin\theta +\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R\alpha -m_{2}a[/tex]
but
[tex]a=R\alpha[/tex]
so
[tex]\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a=m_{2}g\sin\theta +\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a -m_{2}a[/tex]
[tex](m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta-\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a=m_{1}a+\mu m_{1} g \cos\theta[/tex]
[tex]m_{1}a+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a = (m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta+\mu m_{1} g\cos\theta[/tex]
[tex]a(m_{1}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2})=(m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta+\mu m_{1} g\cos\theta[/tex]
something like that anyway
i am more interested in knowing did i get the 3 equations for the 3 unknowns right?

thanks for the help Doc Al
and also sarge99
 
  • #14
So that is the answer. One of my force equations was wrong :O
Thanks for the answer, vladimir
 
  • #15
vladimir69 said:
note: x-axis taken to be parallel to the slope of the incline
Torque equation for cylinder:
[tex]-RF_{f}=\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R^2\alpha[/tex]
=>
[tex]F_{f} = -\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R\alpha[/tex]
Get rid of that minus sign. Express alpha in terms of a, which you do later. This is your first equation.

Forces for block: y direction
[tex]N-m_{1}g\cos\theta=0[/tex]

Forces on block: x direction (*)
[tex]T-\mu N + m_{1}g\sin\theta=m_{1}a[/tex]
[tex]T=\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a[/tex]
Good. This is your second equation.

Forces on cylinder: x direction (*)
[tex]-T+m_{2}g\sin\theta - F_{f} = m_{2}a[/tex]
[tex]T= m_{2}g\sin\theta - F_{f} -m_{2}a[/tex]
Good. This is your third equation.

popping everything in
[tex]\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a=m_{2}g\sin\theta +\frac{1}{2}m_{2}R\alpha -m_{2}a[/tex]
but
[tex]a=R\alpha[/tex]
so
[tex]\mu m_{1}g\cos\theta-m_{1}g\sin\theta+m_{1}a=m_{2}g\sin\theta +\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a -m_{2}a[/tex]
[tex](m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta-\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a=m_{1}a+\mu m_{1} g \cos\theta[/tex]
[tex]m_{1}a+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}a = (m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta+\mu m_{1} g\cos\theta[/tex]
[tex]a(m_{1}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2})=(m_{1}+m_{2})g\sin\theta+\mu m_{1} g\cos\theta[/tex]
something like that anyway
You have a sign error, carried from your first equation above. (But almost there! :smile:)
 
  • #16
Got it thanks Doc Al
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K