Block and wedge problem -- Where am I going wrong?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a block and wedge problem from the book by Kleppner and Kolenkow. The original poster is attempting to find the minimum acceleration value, but their result differs from the official solution provided. They express confusion regarding the equations of normal force and friction involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the correctness of their calculations and the official solution, particularly regarding the normal force equations as the angle approaches zero. They seek clarification on the discrepancies between their findings and the official answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered their perspectives on the equations presented, suggesting that there may be inconsistencies in the official solution's free body diagrams. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the equations of motion and forces involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they are working from a mobile device and have encountered issues with image quality when uploading handwritten equations, which may affect the clarity of their presented work. They express a preference for using images over typing equations in LaTeX due to the volume of content.

NTesla
Messages
273
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
Kindly see the attached pic for the Question. I'm solving part b of the question.
Relevant Equations
F = ma
This question is from the book Kleppner and Kolenkow Q 3.8:
IMG_20240611_181455.jpg


___________________________________
My attempt is posted here:
IMG_20240611_182304.jpg


___________________________________

The value of a(minimum) that I'm getting is different from the official solution. The official solution is posted here:

IMG_20240611_182538.jpg


___________________________________

Here's 2 problems that I'm encountering:

(a) The value of a(minimum) that I'm getting is different from the official answer. If my calculations are wrong, I'm not able to find out where am I going wrong. Kindly help.

(b) From the equation of N(in my calculation), if theta tends to zero, then N tends to mg. This makes sense to me.
However, in the official answer(posted above), if we try to see what happens to value of N as theta tends to zero, then N becomes mg/mu(the symbol of coefficient of friction). This doesn't make sense to me. So, which equation of N is correct ?

___________________________________

I understand that in the official answer, the equations have been written from inertial frame of reference. I understand those equations and they are right according to me. This is causing a conundrum, that if I'm finding the official equations right(which I do), then the value of a(minimum) must be right as given in the official answer. But I'm also not able to find where my equations are wrong(if they are wrong), leading to different value of a(minimum).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240611_181455.jpg
    IMG_20240611_181455.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 73
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks correct to me. The error in the official solution is here:

1718116010372.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and NTesla
Screen Shot 2024-06-11 at 9.07.48 AM.png
The solution is wrong. Look at the equation, part (b) vertical direction, $$N\sin\theta+f_s\cos\theta-mg=0.\tag{1}$$Now look at the solution's two FBDs on the right.

In the first FBD, angle ##\theta## is defined as the angle between the horizontal and the incline. Equation (1) was derived from the second FBD. In it angle ##\theta## is labeled as the angle between the vertical and the incline which makes the two FBDs inconsistent. Equation (1) should have the sine and cosine swapped to be consistent with the definition of ##\theta## as the angle of the incline.

By the way, you have posted here enough times to appreciate the advantage of using LaTeX to write equations. To learn how, please click "LaTeX Guide", lower left above "Attach files". It's easy to learn and will serve you well.

I see that @TSny beat me to the punch.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR, berkeman and NTesla
kuruman said:
I see that @TSny beat me to the punch.
Only by a second or two. Amazing.
 
TSny said:
Only by a second or two. Amazing.
It could have been simultaneous if both of us were at rest relative to the PF server when we posted. :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: gmax137, TSny and berkeman
@kuruman, @TSny : Thanks for the prompt help.

Earlier when I used to upload pics of my hand written equations in this forum, it used to be sharp and clear enough to be read. But this time, after reading your advice of using latex, I was checking whether the uploaded pics were clear and sharp or not. I observed that the pics that I have on my phone (which I uploaded here) are quite sharp, but after having uploaded, the pics are not sharp at all. I don't know why that has happened. The picture quality has been reduced to the point of not being clear enough to be read.

I'm typing this on phone, don't have access to desktop/laptop, & as there were a full page of equations and calculations, that was the reason why I preferred to upload the pic of written page, rather than typing each line of calculation. It was efficient compared to typing the whole page in latex, that too on the phone. I hadn't encountered low upload quality earlier, but only this time. In some of my earlier posts, I did write in LaTeX when there were only a few equations to write. I also hadn't anticipated that the compression algorithm in this forum would render the image quality too difficult to read.

If uploading pics in original quality is possible, then kindly let me know the way to do so. If not, then I'll try to write using latex from next time onwards, wherever necessary.
 
Last edited:
Here is a test scribbled work for comparison posted directly from my phone. It’s pretty well-defined. Using a black pen and enlarging the posted photo to fill the page helps.
IMG_2696.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTesla
NTesla said:
as there were a full page of equations and calculations, that was the reason why I preferred to upload the pic of written page, rather than typing each line of calculation.
One reason we prefer typed in equations is for ease of quoting. We may need to make reference to a particular one of your equations. It will help, therefore, if you number them all.
We may also want to post an edited version of an equation, which again is easier if we can copy the original. Since it often happens that there are multiple posts in response to the one original, it can be less work in total if the original is copyable line by line.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K