Block on a vertical spring, finding frequency

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass m placed on a platform of mass M, which is supported by a vertical, massless spring with a spring constant k. The questions focus on determining the compression of the spring when the system is at rest and the frequency of vertical oscillation when the spring is further compressed by an additional distance x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the relationship between the forces acting on the system and the spring's compression. Some participants question the independence of frequency from amplitude and suggest that a new second law equation must be formulated to account for the additional compression.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the setup of the problem, with some providing guidance on how to approach the second law equation. There are differing opinions on the relationship between frequency and amplitude, indicating an exploration of various interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the mass M's relevance to the problem, with some participants suggesting it should not affect the compression calculation. The discussion includes references to specific equations and the need for clarity on the assumptions made regarding the system's setup.

laurenm02
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m is on a platform of mass M, supported by a vertical, massless spring with spring constant k.

When the system is at rest, how much is the spring compressed?
When the spring is pushed an extra distance x, what is the frequency of vertical oscillation?

Homework Equations


F = -kx

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first question, I set F = mg = -kx, where m = (M + m), and found x = (M+m)g/-k

For the second part, I'm not sure how to set it up. I first thought that frequency is independent of amplitude, but I was told that I have to first write a new second law equation and then find an equation of motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frequency will not be independent of amplitude, because the frequency depends on the force exerted by the spring, which in turn depends on the amplitude of the compression. So yes, you'll have to write out a new second law equation taking into account the extra compression.
 
sk1105 said:
So yes, you'll have to write out a new second law equation taking into account the extra compression

Can I get a little guidance on this? I'm not sure how to set it up.
 
Hi laurenm02! :)

sk1105 said:
Frequency will not be independent of amplitude, because the frequency depends on the force exerted by the spring, which in turn depends on the amplitude of the compression. So yes, you'll have to write out a new second law equation taking into account the extra compression.

Sorry, but frequency is independent of amplitude.

laurenm02 said:

Homework Statement


A block of mass m is on a platform of mass M, supported by a vertical, massless spring with spring constant k.

When the system is at rest, how much is the spring compressed?
When the spring is pushed an extra distance x, what is the frequency of vertical oscillation?

Homework Equations


F = -kx

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first question, I set F = mg = -kx, where m = (M + m), and found x = (M+m)g/-k

For the second part, I'm not sure how to set it up. I first thought that frequency is independent of amplitude, but I was told that I have to first write a new second law equation and then find an equation of motion.

The mass M should not be included. It does not matter whether the spring rests on a platform of mass M or directly on the ground.
What matters, is that we have a mass m that is supported by the spring.
So the compression at rest should be ##\frac{mg}{k}##.

Now suppose we compress the spring by an additional amount ##x##.
Then the resultant force becomes ##F_{result} = k(x_0 - x) - mg##.
Newton's second law states that ##F_{result} = ma##.
So we get that:
$$ma = k(x_0 - x) - mg$$
Or, written as a differential equation:
$$m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = k(x_0 - x) - mg$$

Are you supposed to be able to solve such an equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K