Block On Incline Projected Up With Initial Speed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass 7.4 kg sliding down an inclined plane at a constant velocity and then being projected up the incline with an initial speed of 3.10 m/s. The goal is to determine how far the block moves up the incline before coming to rest, considering the effects of forces acting on the block.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the block, including gravitational and frictional forces, and how these affect the block's motion up the incline. There are attempts to calculate the force parallel to the incline and the resulting acceleration. Some participants express confusion about the implications of constant velocity and the role of friction.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the forces involved, with some participants suggesting the need to calculate the frictional force and its impact on acceleration. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, particularly regarding the assumption of friction on the incline. Participants are providing guidance on how to approach the calculations and clarify the relationships between the forces.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question whether the incline can be assumed to be frictionless, given that the block moves at a constant velocity down the incline. There is also mention of discrepancies in calculated values for forces and acceleration, indicating potential misunderstandings or differing interpretations of the problem setup.

Becca93
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

A block with mass m = 7.4 kg slides down an inclined plane of slope angle 43.8 ° with a constant velocity. It is then projected up the same plane with an initial speed 3.10 m/s. How far up the incline will the block move before coming to rest?


The attempt at a solution

You need to find the force parallel of the block on the incline, so

Fpara = mgsinθ
Fpara = (7.4)(9.8)sin(43.8)
Fpara = 50.194 N

Acceleration down is
a = F/m
a = 50.194/7.4
a = 6.783

If the block begins moving up at Vi = 3.10 m/s, and Vf = 0, then
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
0 = 3.1^2 + (2)(-6.783)d
d = -(3.1)^2 / -13.566
d = 0.708

This is not correct. Obviously, I'm doing this wrong, but I'm not sure of any other way to do it. I feel like having such a large acceleration down can't possibly be correct, and if that is indeed the case, how do I find acceleration of the block as it goes up the incline?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You stated that the block slides at a constant velocity down, and since gravity is acceleration that means there must be a frictional force acting on the block which you must find. If the block is moving at a constant velocity downwards this means that Ftot has to equal zero, so this will allow you to calculate the force of frictiona and the coefficient of kinetic friction.

F// = Fpara = mgsinθ = Ff = μkFN

so you need to solve for the FN force normal to find μk and the normal force is perpendicular to the plane.

[You do not really need to find μk just the force of friction.] Knowing the force of friction and the force of gravity acting against the block as it moves up you will be able to solve for the acceleration of the block and then be able to find the distance at which it stops at.



EDIT*** what you need to do is now the force of friction and force of gravity are acting in the same direction and initially when the block is sliding down they are equal and opposite but when the block is sliding up then they are equal and the same. So you need to sum them up and then solve for the acceleration
 
Liquidxlax said:
You stated that the block slides at a constant velocity down, and since gravity is acceleration that means there must be a frictional force acting on the block which you must find. If the block is moving at a constant velocity downwards this means that Ftot has to equal zero, so this will allow you to calculate the force of frictiona and the coefficient of kinetic friction.

F// = Fpara = mgsinθ = Ff = μkFN

so you need to solve for the FN force normal to find μk and the normal force is perpendicular to the plane.

[You do not really need to find μk just the force of friction.] Knowing the force of friction and the force of gravity acting against the block as it moves up you will be able to solve for the acceleration of the block and then be able to find the distance at which it stops at.



EDIT*** what you need to do is now the force of friction and force of gravity are acting in the same direction and initially when the block is sliding down they are equal and opposite but when the block is sliding up then they are equal and the same. So you need to sum them up and then solve for the acceleration


As it doesn't mention friction in the problem, aren't we supposed to assume that the incline is frictionless?

Either way, I'm working it out like you said now.
 
Becca93 said:
As it doesn't mention friction in the problem, aren't we supposed to assume that the incline is frictionless?

Either way, I'm working it out like you said now.

if it was frictionless then the block would be accelerating down the plane and not moving at a constant velocity.
 
Liquidxlax said:
if it was frictionless then the block would be accelerating down the plane and not moving at a constant velocity.

Good point.

Since on the way down,
Fpara = Ff
50.194 = 50.194

and both of them are acting in the same direction going the opposite way, Ff becomes 100.388, the acceleration back is ridiculously high. It ends up as 13.56 m/s^2. Which is almost 50 km/h. Which doesn't seem in the realm of possibility.

What am I doing wrong?
 
looks right to me. I wouldn't worry about it seeming real considering it's just a made up question not a real life problem
 
Liquidxlax said:
looks right to me. I wouldn't worry about it seeming real considering it's just a made up question not a real life problem

When you plug that acceleration into the equation Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad, you get 0.345 which is incorrect.

Is there something to this that I'm missing?
 
Draw a free body diagram for the block on the incline. Note that while gravity acts straight down from the block, the normal force has components. As such, if we sum the forces acting in the y direction, you will get an expression for FN (the normal force) in terms of gravity (I leave it to you to figure out which trigonometric ratio to use).

Also, you may or may not be aware that if an object slides with constant velocity down a slope, its coefficient of friction is equal to tanθ. With this knowledge, and the normal force, we can find the frictional force.

Using Newton's Second Law, if we return to the x direction, and sum those forces as we did for the y direction, we should be able to find the acceleration of the block, at which point you can use a basic kinematics equation that involves known variables of acceleration, final and initial speed and the required unknown distance to solve for the distance. (I believe you have already made reference to this equation.)

Hope this helps! :)
 
Hi Becca93! :smile:

Becca93 said:
Good point.

Since on the way down,
Fpara = Ff
50.194 = 50.194

and both of them are acting in the same direction going the opposite way, Ff becomes 100.388, the acceleration back is ridiculously high. It ends up as 13.56 m/s^2. Which is almost 50 km/h. Which doesn't seem in the realm of possibility.

What am I doing wrong?

How did you get Fpara?
I get a different value (52.34 N).
Edit: sorry, your value is right.

Btw, your acceleration is not ridiculously high.
In particular you can not convert it to a speed of 50 km/h, since it is not a speed, it's an acceleration (that's just a little over the standard acceleration of gravity).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Hi Becca93! :smile:



How did you get Fpara?
I get a different value (52.34 N).

Btw, your acceleration is not ridiculously high.
In particular you can not convert it to a speed of 50 km/h, since it is not a speed, it's an acceleration (that's just a little over the standard acceleration of gravity).

Hey! Thanks for pointing that out. I used mgcosθ to get Fn, and mgsinθ to get Fpara.

I did get the answer to the question though! It ended up being 0.354 m, not 0.345 m like I got earlier.

Thanks to everyone for the help! It was seriously appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K