Body attached to a block by a spring, shaped like an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a body attached to a spring on an inclined plane. The initial approach involves calculating the velocity of the body relative to the block using momentum conservation and energy conservation principles. A proposed alternative method suggests directly equating elastic potential energy to kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy for the body, but this does not yield the correct result. The key misunderstanding is that some of the energy is converted into kinetic energy of the block, which must be accounted for in the calculations. Ultimately, the correct solution requires considering the energy distribution between both the body and the block.
kekpillangok
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A body of mass 𝑚 slides without friction on the flat surface (which is inclined at an angle 𝛼 relative to the horizontal) of a block of mass 𝑀 under the action of a spring, as shown in the figure. This spring, with a spring constant 𝑘 and a natural length 𝐶, has its ends fixed respectively to the body of mass 𝑚 and to the block. In turn, the block can slide without friction on the flat and horizontal surface on which it rests. The body is pulled up to a position where the spring is stretched to a length 𝐿 (𝐿 > 𝐶), such that, when released, the body passes through the position where the elastic force is zero. In this position, what is the magnitude of the velocity of the block in terms of L, C, m, M, g (acceleration of gravity), 𝛼, and k?
Relevant Equations
E_s = kx^2 / 2
Ek + Ep + E_s = K
I was taught to solve this problem by first finding the velocity of the body (of mass ##m ##) relative to the block of mass ##M ##. One way of doing this is as follows: first write $$ {v _{m _{B }}}^{2 }={v _{mx _{B }}}^{2 }+{v _{my }}^{2 } (I) $$

where ##{v _{m _{B }}} ## is the magnitude of the velocity of the body of mass ##m ## with respect to the block, and the other terms are the horizontal and vertical components of that velocity. Then, we know that $$v _{mx }=v _{mx _{B }}-v _{M } (II) $$

where ##v _{mx } ## is the horizontal component of the velocity of the body relative to the earth and ##v _{M } ## is the velocity of the block, also relative to the earth. ##v _{M } ## is what we want to find.

Also, because momentum is conserved, we have $$m \cdot v _{mx }=M \cdot v _{M } (III) $$.

Now, from equations II and III, we get ##v _{mx _{B }}=v _{M }{\left( \frac{M +m }{m }\right) } ##. Then, if we look at the geometry of the velocity of the body relative to the block, we see that ##\tan \left( \alpha \right) \, =\frac{v _{my }}{v _{mx _{B }}} ##. This lets you solve for the ## y ## component of the velocity of the body relative to the block in terms of the velocity of the block. Replacing these components into equation I and finally into the relationship for energy conservation—$$\frac{1 }{2 }k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }=\frac{1 }{2 }m {v _{m }}^{2 }+\frac{1 }{2 }M {v _{M }}^{2 }+m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, $$

—lets you solve for ## v _{M }## in terms of the given parameters.

This way of solving the problem is clear to me. What I don't understand is, why can't I just find the magnitude of the velocity of the body relative to the block directly by writing $$ \frac{1 }{2 }k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }=\frac{1 }{2 }m {v _{m B }}^{2 }+m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, $$

and solving for ##v _{mB } ##? Isn't it true that, relative to the block, all the elastic potential energy gets converted only into kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy for the body?

This would give me a value of ##\sqrt{\frac{k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }-2 m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, }{m }}\cos \left( \alpha \right) \, ## for the horizontal component of the velocity of the body relative to the block. This value minus ## v _{M }## should equal the horizontal component of the velocity of the body relative to the earth, which could then be plugged into the conservation of momentum expression and so allow me to find ## v _{M }##. This approach, however, does not lead to the right answer. Why doesn't it work? I really can't see why energy doesn't get converted the way I expect it to.

The right answer, obtained by the first method, is ## v _{M }=\sqrt{\frac{2 m {\left[ \frac{1 }{2 }k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }-m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, \right] }}{{\left( m +M \right) }{\left[ {\left( m +M \right) }\tan ^{2 } \left( \alpha \right) \, +M \right] }}}##.

The answer I arrived at by the second method, which was the idea I came up with first, was ##v _{M }=\sqrt{\frac{2 m {\left[ \frac{1 }{2 }k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }-m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, \right] }}{{{\left( M +m \right) }}^{2 }{\left( 1 +\tan ^{2 } \alpha \, \right) }}} ##.

I know this is really messy, but any help will be greatly appreciated. My doubt, at any rate, is a simple one: why can't I find the velocity of the body relative to the block by "pretending" that all the energy gets converted into kinetic energy and g.p.e for the body?
 

Attachments

  • physics-problem.png
    physics-problem.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 45
Physics news on Phys.org
kekpillangok said:
we know that $$v _{mx }=v _{mx _{B }}-v _{M } (II) $$
Not if all horizontal velocities are defined as positive in the same direction.
kekpillangok said:
why can't I just find the magnitude of the velocity of the body relative to the block directly by writing $$ \frac{1 }{2 }k {{\left( L -C \right) }}^{2 }=\frac{1 }{2 }m {v _{m B }}^{2 }+m g {\left( L -C \right) }\sin \left( \alpha \right) \, $$
Because some of the energy turns into KE of the block.
 
  • Informative
Likes kekpillangok
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...

Similar threads

Back
Top