Bohr Model missing momentum question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of the Bohr atomic model, particularly regarding the treatment of angular momentum and energy transitions between electron shells. Participants highlight that the angular momentum change, represented as (n2-n1)h_bar, is inadequately addressed when considering photon absorption and emission. The conversation critiques the model's assumption that photons can possess the precise trajectory and momentum required for energy transitions, questioning the credibility of these assumptions. Overall, the Bohr model's neglect of kinetic energy changes during orbital transitions is emphasized as a significant flaw.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bohr atomic model and its assumptions
  • Familiarity with angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of photon properties and interactions
  • Basic grasp of relativistic 4-vector momentum concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the limitations of the Bohr model in quantum mechanics
  • Study the Rydberg formula and its derivation
  • Learn about angular momentum conservation in quantum systems
  • Investigate modern quantum mechanical models, such as the Schrödinger equation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in atomic theory, quantum mechanics, and the historical context of the Bohr model's limitations.

ianbell
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
In the Bohr atomic model, electrons move between shells having angular momentum L_n = n h_bar where n is the shell number and the difference in shell energies E_n2-E_n1 matches the Rydberg energy of the emitted or absorbed photon.

My question is: what hapened to the angular momentum (n2-n1)h_bar?

For this to be carried in or out by the "massless" photon (assuming we abandon Bohr classicism for relativistic 4-vector momentae) would require the photon trajectory to be at a precisely correct angle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Of course"? You mean that's the theory? An incoming photon already of precisely absorbable wavelength just happens to have precisely the right trajectory to provide the necessary angular momentum too?? What are the odds?

If the atom was scattering photons it might be more credable but isn't the electron is supposed to "absorb" the photon to acquire all its energy?

Furthermore, the constuction of the Bohr model to provide the Rydberg formula seems to neglect the change in kinetic energy when moving from one orbit to another. Or have I missed something?



hit the electron at precisely the right point in its orb
 
ianbell said:
In the Bohr atomic model, electrons move between shells having angular momentum L_n = n h_bar where n is the shell number and the difference in shell energies E_n2-E_n1 matches the Rydberg energy of the emitted or absorbed photon.

My question is: what hapened to the angular momentum (n2-n1)h_bar?

For this to be carried in or out by the "massless" photon (assuming we abandon Bohr classicism for relativistic 4-vector momentae) would require the photon trajectory to be at a precisely correct angle.
The intensity of the emitted radiation varies as |P_L(cos\theta)|^2 where L is the angular momentum of the emitted photon. (This is for a 100% polarized atom).
 
Last edited:
But if the electron is absorbing a photon to gain energy, why should this photon have precisely the correct mementum too? If it sheds surplus momentum by emitting a photon, it will lose energy.
 
Why shouldn't it have precisely the correct momentum? Remember this is the Bohr model...
 
"Why shouldn't it have precisely the correct momentum?"

Because its just not credable. This is angular momentum so the photon has to have /exactly/ the right trajectory. The absence of consideration of orbital kinetic energy alarms me too.
 
This is the Bohr model. There's a reason it isn't used anymore: it's very, very wrong.
 
This is angular momentum so the photon has to have /exactly/ the right trajectory.

Er, yes? The Bohr model is semiclassical, so this fits. I'm not sure what your problem with this is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K