Question About Bohr's Quantified Shell Model

  • Thread starter octagon
  • Start date
  • #1
7
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I'm sure this has a straightforward explanation and am hoping someone can answer it for me.

Looking at this diagram of Bohr's quantified shell model of the atom:

http://library.thinkquest.org/C005775/Theory/oldtheory_section3.html

...I don't understand what is preventing the electron from colliding with the nucleus after n=1, since it still has one unit of energy left, and each previous orbit only required one unit of energy to move it to the next smaller orbit.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
194
octagon, The Bohr theory was an early attempt to explain the atom in nearly classical terms. Electrons were supposed to be like little BBs that circled the nucleus in well-defined orbits, and emitted radiation by jumping from one orbit to another. It was soon realized that while this theory explained some features, it was quite wrong on others. It was replaced by the Schrodinger theory in 1926. The Bohr theory is now of historical interest only. On the web page you're reading, if you go ahead a few steps you'll find this explained.
 
  • #3
189
0
I'm sure this has a straightforward explanation and am hoping someone can answer it for me.

Looking at this diagram of Bohr's quantified shell model of the atom:

http://library.thinkquest.org/C005775/Theory/oldtheory_section3.html

...I don't understand what is preventing the electron from colliding with the nucleus after n=1, since it still has one unit of energy left, and each previous orbit only required one unit of energy to move it to the next smaller orbit.

Thanks.
The total enegies are the same in both Bohr model and Schrodinger's hydrogen.
As both satisfy the Virial theorem, 2K = - V, the average kinetic energies (K) and potential energies (V) are the same, too.

In n=1 state (1s), Bohr model electron doesn't collide with nucleus, because the angular momentum is not zero.
(Instead, the "radial" kinetic energy is zero in the circular orbit.)
To get the kinetic energies the same, Schrodinger's hydrogen needs to have "radial" kinetic energy, because the angular momentum is zero ( L = 0 ) in 1s state.

When we solve the Schrodinger equation for hydrogen, we choose the next boundary condition to prevent divergence,

[tex] u_l (r) = rR_l (r) \qquad u_l (r) \to e^{-\rho r} \quad ( r \to \infty) \qquad u_l (r) \to r^{l+1} \quad ( r \to 0 )[/tex]
The instant you choose this boundary condition, a "mountain" (= wavelength) is generated in the "radial" direction
This means "radial" kinetic enegy is not zero, when you choose this boundary condition.
Instead you have to get the angular momentum (= tangential kinetic energy) zero ( L=0 ) in the Schrodinger equation.

By the way, when the angular momentum is not zero, it is impossible that the electron comes closer to the nucleus than a point (perihelion) in Bohr's planetary model.
When the angular momentum is L (of course, L is constant), the "tangential" kinetic energy (T) is,

[tex] mv_{\theta} r = L \quad \to \quad T = \frac{1}{2} mv_{\theta}^2 =\frac{1}{2} \frac{L^2}{m r^2} [/tex]
So this tangential kinetic energy increases at the inverse square of the radius (1/r^2).
At the points near r = 0, the sum of tangential kinetic energy and potential energy is

[tex] T + V = \frac{1}{2} \frac{L^2}{m r^2} - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r} \to +\infty \quad ( r \to 0 ) [/tex]
So to keep the total energy ( E < 0 ) constant, the "radial" kinetic energy (R) becomes minus in Schrodinger equation within perihelion.

[tex] R = \frac{1}{2}m v_r^2 < 0 \qquad T = \frac{1}{2} m v_{\theta}^2 > 0 \qquad ( R + T + V = E < 0 )[/tex]
This result shows that "minus" electron mass ( m < 0 ) and "plus" electron mass ( m > 0) are mixed in Schrodinger equation ?
I couldn't find any clear answers in textbooks. I'm glad if someone teach me about this interpretation.
(I heard Einstein noticed the flaw of imaginary number in Schrodinger's hydrogen instantly when he saw the result.
Of couse, Schrodinger himself was not satisfied with this result.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
7
0
Thanks for the replies. Very helpful.
 

Related Threads on Question About Bohr's Quantified Shell Model

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
547
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
689
Replies
2
Views
688
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
605
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
700
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
934
Top